User talk:Succcculent

November 2021

Hello, I'm Cordless Larry. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Teahouse have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Succcculent's abusive message. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cordless Larry (talk · contribs) please remove the discussion that you initiated on the admin board. Succcculent (talk) 22:51, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Succcculent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

While I agree that some punishment is necessary for the PA, I don't think a long term block is appropriate. I've not been here very long, and I would like to contribute. Im not sure to what, I need some suggestions. Succcculent (talk) 23:08, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your edit history indicates you are not here to build an encyclopedia -- Euryalus (talk) 00:06, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Cordless Larry (talk · contribs) Deor (talk · contribs)Succcculent (talk) 23:08, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to review my own block, but if you would like to contribute, why on earth did you choose to make this your first edit? Deor (talk) 23:13, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop pinging me. If you want to appeal your block, fine, but please don't involve me. Cordless Larry (talk) 23:16, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Euryalus (talk · contribs) What must I do to contribute to the Wikipedia? And that's not fair to assume that I will be unconstructive. I want to somehow prove that I can be a useful contributor.Succcculent (talk) 00:13, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's unconvincing given your edits to date are vandalism, a personal attack and this unblock request. Perhaps draft some useful edits in your sandbox page, as examples of what you'd like to work on if your account was unblocked. Up to you. -- Euryalus (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They're blocked. They cannot edit their sandbox. I might offer them a template:second chance, but they have no TPA. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:59, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I should have said this page rather than sandbox. TPA was revoked by someone else. Given their very first edit involved markup I don't believe this is a genuine new editor, but if there's some convincing evidence they intend to make useful contributions from now then fine by me. -- Euryalus (talk) 18:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love to ask them about that part, if they should respond at UTRS. Lack of response moots second chance template. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:19, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 51514

UTRS appeal #51514 is open. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:59, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This ticket is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]