User talk:Subhash Chandra Gandhi

Welcome!

Hello, Subhash Chandra Gandhi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Upendra. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Tito Dutta ✉ 12:07, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS

Stop adding biased statements like "Block-busters", "Biggest hit of the year" unless you can provide WP:RS. Also see WP:SOCK, do not edit from multiple accounts in case you are doing so User:Abhijit puranik, User:Shafal1392 --Tito Dutta ✉ 17:37, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Upendra, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Tito Dutta ✉ 22:04, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Upendra, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Stop removing templates before solving the issue! And rowspan=1 is not necessary. Try to add WP:RS when you add/edit something. If you have any question you can post in my talk page! Tito Dutta ✉ 15:30, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Upendra, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 12:44, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Upendra shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
The sources which are are trying to add are NOT reliable. You have been warned a number of times, please take notice of this and discuss it with User:Titodutta as they have offered to help. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 12:45, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also read WP:SOCK. I have been very lazy here and did not submit any report against your accounts. But, I don't think everyone will be lazy like me. Since you can see other editors are participating now, don't blame me if you get blocked from Wikipedia (if applicable) --Tito Dutta ✉ 13:05, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Need_help_here.21 regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —Tito Dutta ✉ 04:07, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

CheckUser evidence has determined that this user account has or may be used abusively. This account has been blocked permanently to prevent abuse.

Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement). -- $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 23:30, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]