User talk:Subdeacon

You edited the article on The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America without reading it thoroughly. The PECUSA referred to in the article is the Continuing Anglican church that goes by that name today. The PECUSA you are referring to is the older name The Episcopal Church used to use before the 1960's.

So I think we need a stub or a redirect on the Episcopal Church page. Otherwise, confusion will reign.

tracing churches back to St. Louis

You added this: but fewer than a dozen of the churches popularly called "Continuing churches" can be traced back to the meeting in St. Louis.

Do you know which ones?Sweetmoose6 (talk) 21:41, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anglicanism in the Americas

I noticed that you recently removed the links on Anglicanism in the Americas to Anglican Use and Antiochian Western Rite Vicariate. Please participate in the discussion of this on Talk:Anglicanism in the Americas. --Bruce Hall (talk) 16:27, 8 July 2009 (UTC) ......................................................[reply]

The fact is that these churches ARE NOT ANGLICAN. As had been correctly noted by the person who added them to the list, they are either Roman Catholic or Eastern Orthodox. They are entities created by those churches for FORMER Anglicans.

It would be more helpful to add comments to Talk:Anglicanism_in_the_Americas so that everyone can participate in the discussion. While these entities are not "Anglican", they are clearly part of the Anglican tradition and therefore I think fall under the title "Anglicanism in America". The suffix "ism" broadens the meaning to include all institutions that are within the Anglican tradition. I think that any institution that worships using a version or a derivative of the Book of Common Prayer and that follows broadly Anglican tradition should be included. Perhaps we need a third category added to the list, as I suggested. If you post your comments at Talk:Anglicanism_in_the_Americas then everyone can benefit from your perspective and the article can be improved. --Bruce Hall (talk) 02:02, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of North American Anglican Conference

The article North American Anglican Conference has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Graham (talk) 20:14, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Subdeacon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Subdeacon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve American Anglican Church

Hello, Subdeacon,

Thanks for creating American Anglican Church! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 16:58, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Meatsgains: I really don't know how to do these things, but I listed the American Anglican Church's own webpage which gives alomost the same exact info and stats, so why isn't that the reference? Subdeacon (talk) 17:01, 6 August 2019 (UTC)SubdeaconSubdeacon (talk) 17:01, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read through WP:RS when you get a chance to familiarize yourself with reliable sources. A church's own website would be considered a primary source - we need secondary sources to establish notability. Meatsgains^(talk) 00:49, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - TheLionHasSeen (talk) 00:41, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]