User talk:Stvsxtn

Welcome!

Hello, Stvsxtn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Steve Sexton Composer, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — e. ripley\^talk 18:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steve Sexton Composer

The article Steve Sexton Composer has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — e. ripley\^talk 18:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Rd232 ^talk 20:02, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Steve Sexton Composer has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.myspace.com/exchangecanada.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:20, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the Wikipedia policy on autobiographies carefully. PK T(alk) 12:50, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Steve Sexton (composer)

I have nominated Steve Sexton (composer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Sexton (composer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rd232 ^talk 13:08, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully have made changed to satisfy the requirements, a work in progress (sorry), happy to hear your crticisms.

Stvsxtn (talk) 02:34, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry forgot to enter Edit summary.

Stvsxtn (talk) 02:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed my entries were edited ..... thank you for whoever did it.

I had entered a long discography but am assuming it's not acceptable as it took alot of work?

Have made further changes as requested. Addition of Olympics was made as it was a major breakthrough for the band Exchange and Steve Sexton (and Gerald O'Brien), will search out any references.

Stvsxtn (talk) 13:25, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm the one who has made the changes. See my latest comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Sexton (composer) for why. You should now stay away from the article and make any suggestions for further suitably referenced claims to notability at the AfD discussion. First of all, because you have a serious conflict of interest and should not be editing the article at all, let alone having created it. Secondly, you don't understand what constitutes an appropriate and reliable source to establish notability. Please read WP:NM, WP:VERIFY and WP:RELY to learn more. Regards, Voceditenore (talk) 13:52, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have ceased to add anything or edit.

Stvsxtn (talk) 15:05, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thanks so much for your message. I had initially tagged it for eventual deletion because it was a biography of a living person that had no sources, which can be deleted after 10 days. This is done to protect living people who may have disparaging articles written about them on Wikipedia. But once sources were added to the article I removed the living persons-related deletion tag. Then someone else nominated it for a more "regular" deletion regarding whether the subject of the article was notable enough, User:Rd232. But, sort of like a ball rolling downhill, once a deletion discussion has started, you can't really stop it. The only person who can officially close it is an administrator, so even Rd232 can't at this point. What will happen is once an administrator decides that the discussion has had enough time to run its course (usually about a week), the administrator will then examine the discussion and determine whether there is a consensus to either keep or delete the article. Then the administrator will execute that consensus. The good news is that at this point the consensus of opinion about the article is that it be kept (I myself voted keep). So unless the article attracts a lot more "delete" votes (which I personally don't think it will), then the article will most likely be kept. On a personal note, thank you for sticking with the process, it can be confusing and daunting to new contributors but ultimately it exists to ensure that we have the best free encyclopedia we can have. Best — e. ripley\^talk 21:21, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]