User talk:SturzaCosmin

Osmia

There are a number of guides to creating your first article (WP:FIRST, for example) and a number of different ways to do it. Unfortunately, you didn't choose any of the recommend ways. The redirect Osmia is there because it is the scientific name of a mason bee family. Many articles in Wikipedia link to Osmia, and no doubt many urls all over the web do too. So to put it simply, "hands off".

To create a Wikipedia article when the title you want is unavailable, you "disambiguate" it, which means something like Osmia (artist). Now, if you are capable of writing an article from scratch, complete with reliable references, and are fairly certain that it is notable, then go ahead. However, apparently you can't, which is to be expected with your first article. Instead, consider the articles for creation method which will walk you through the steps. Or if you think you know the steps, but need a few tries to get it all straight (because if you don't get it reasonably straight it is liable to be deleted, or kicked back to draft if you're lucky), then you could write it in your sandbox (link at the top, sometimes the side, of the page. Or you can write it in draft (eg. Draft:Osmia (artist)) which makes it possible for other people to collaborate without stepping on your toes in your own sandbox. Lithopsian (talk) 20:33, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, SturzaCosmin. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Osmia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:58, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Osmia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Osmia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:21, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SturzaCosmin, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Jalen Folf (talk) 03:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 03:02, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]