User talk:Stunink

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Most Pure Heart of Mary Catholic Church, Topeka, Kansas was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:11, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Most Pure Heart of Mary Catholic Church, Topeka, Kansas was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:57, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Most Pure Heart of Mary Catholic Church, Topeka, Kansas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Stunink (talk) 22:23, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfC

While strictly speaking AfC is voluntary, approving your own page sets off a red light of sorts that may draw more attention to you. I would like to warn you that if you can not demonstrate notability for the church (as distinct from the previously existing Stone Folly) the article may be deleted via Articles for deletion. —Soap— 22:54, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just created my first Wikipedia page, which the instructions said not to be afraid to do. I tried to follow the instructions, by creating my page first as a subpage of my user page and then move it. However, I didn't know how to move it and found a tip to use this AfC tag at the top. When I did that I got a link saying that I didn't have to do that since I'm a registered user. I just barely got my page started and now I'm being told that it's going to be deleted. I'm probably not even doing this talk thing right. So far, not a very good experience with Wikipedia. Stunink (talk) 23:13, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Basically red flags because you created your own submission, probably by accident though. The article itself doesn't seem to fit the Notability guidelines for organizations (something which a church is). That being said, you seem to have a lot of clue and can actually write an article as a new user (trust me, this is one of the better articles that I see daily). The article as it stands will probably be deleted unless you can link it to something big but you are welcome to stay on this project and try to help improve the article or write new material that may interest you. I would recommend the latter because it would be the best route to go and you are sure to gain valuable skills by sticking around. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:22, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well either the church is notable or it's not. Frankly it doesn't matter whether you're the friendliest and most dedicated editor ever if you're writing about a subject that doesn't meet our inclusion guidelines. I understand it is frustrating but there is nothing that I or anyone else can do to keep the article on Wikipedia if it isn't notable. If you do believe it's notable you should be able to show us so by providing examples of sources unconnected to the church writing about the church, in accordance with the guidelines spelled out at Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). —Soap— 23:25, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Most Pure Heart of Mary Catholic Church, Topeka, Kansas

I have nominated Most Pure Heart of Mary Catholic Church, Topeka, Kansas, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most Pure Heart of Mary Catholic Church, Topeka, Kansas. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:58, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to Topeka Wikipedia Day Event Jan 15 2013

Because you are editing wikipedia about Topeka, I would like to invite you to Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Wikipedia_Day at the Library at 6:30 PM please can you also print the poster and distribute it? thanks, mike James Michael DuPont (talk) 18:52, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Filippo Iannone listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Filippo Iannone. Since you had some involvement with the Filippo Iannone redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Bamyers99 (talk) 19:58, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fernando José Monteiro Guimarães listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fernando José Monteiro Guimarães. Since you had some involvement with the Fernando José Monteiro Guimarães redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Bamyers99 (talk) 19:58, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ryszard Kasyna listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ryszard Kasyna. Since you had some involvement with the Ryszard Kasyna redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Bamyers99 (talk) 19:58, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]