User talk:Stufacts

June 2019

Hello, I'm Mcmatter. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, William Sutton (Southport), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:56, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Duke

I have done the family tree. If you need anything more contact me at stusutton@outlook.com Stufacts (talk) 17:43, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at William Sutton (Southport), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 21:08, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

?

What part of the family tree has been done professionally and the additional information i put on there is fact do you not understand? Why would I lie about it? There is no financial gain to be had it's just something that our family is proud of! What makes you an expert anyway? If you actually took the time to look it up before removing it, it would save you the effort and stop you looking like a bit of a saddo to be honest! But if you are that petty so be it! Hope you are happy knowing you have made 2, 13 year old boys upset! I pity you Stufacts (talk) 06:43, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your questions in order;

"What part of the family tree has been done professionally and the additional information i put on there is fact do you not understand?" That you have not provided any reliable sources to back up this claim of the 2 boys to be the only remaining male decent. As this is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, as you have already seen, we must be vigilant and quick to remove anything that could be false information, unless someone provides a secondary source considered to be reliable to support the claim. This is the only way for us to be able to verify the possible truth.

"Why would I lie?" No one has said you were lying.

"What makes you an Expert?" Nothing, but you have only placed in supposed facts with nothing to prove your claims.

Please also remember this is an Encyclopedia and that not every fact needs to be captured in it. Wikipedia is not a family tree site and adding the last living relative to a person who has passed almost 200 years ago does not add to William Sutton's story unless the boys have done something to be notable on their own that ties into William's story. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

I do think that adding that his bloodline is still going adds to the story of the duke. Apologies i came across so bluntly my lads were very upset it was removed. To answer your question the family tree was done at my late aunts expense by a professional geniologist(sorry if that is spelt wrong) unfortunately I do not have anything myself on paper i will have to somehow get in touch with my cousin who will have the documents. I have been to Southport townhall and there is a small exhibition with Williams fiddle and log book and a few other things but not much in the way of family history before him or after. I have seen a website were other distant relatives have commented but only our line goes back directly father to son and so forth . My grandfather used to joke he was royalty and nobody understood why until my aunt got the research done but he obviously knew but didn't tell anyone or it was just he shared his name as does my son. Stufacts (talk) 14:39, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]