User talk:Studiokazuyo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre The content is not accurate. Mostly lie. The photos are all fake. I think it is not the accurate history and should be revised ASAP. It is a propaganda of China and US.There were no Nanking Massacre we all know know.

July 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. -- dsprc ^[talk] 05:19, 27 July 2014 (UTC) Thanks for your information about talk.I was able to edit the historical Nanking Massacre. However, I think it is frustrating that Nanking Massacre is all lie and you locked it so that no one can write over. You know my Chinese friends only read this wiki (no other books) and accused me therefore I looked into wiki page. It is not accurate you only reflect one side in the information page like wiki. Needs to be accurate not propaganda and for you to lock it so no one can edit is not very a civilized manner. I have edited many time but goes back to the original. I am tired. I think some wired thing is going on. Wikipedia about Nanking is so much side of China if you read it it is ill fated and cannot even put the accurate information. Why??? What acheaves if it is lie.

Discussion at Talk:Historiography of the Nanking Massacre

Please discuss your proposed additions at Talk:Historiography of the Nanking Massacre.Zmflavius (talk) 02:14, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

I did but not hopeful because https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Zmflavius, it says Chinese organization. It is very controled by ZUmlfavius who is Chinese not even American.

Reposting here FYI.

Allow me to point out WP:NOR. Wikipedia is not in the habit of pushing a Chinese view or a Japanese view, Wikipedia's role is to publish information that is based on reliable, published sources. However, you did not supply any sources for your claims, such as that the photos were fake. If you wish to learn more about sourcing, it would behoove you to read more of WP:NOR. Finally, in reference to your talk page, while a member of Wikiproject China, I am actually Chinese-American. Nor do I control wikiproject China, and its role is not to push the "Chinese view" on matters. It is simply a group which handles the articles related to China on wikipedia.Zmflavius (talk) 14:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

You know wikipedia is not academic and every one knows (we do not cite wiki for our college essay) that but my Chinese friend is not academic so I decided to change the wiki of Nanking. I only changed your writing like"Japan lied" you have some citation under and I do not looked at it but it is probably just a minor source. I also added a massacre before Nanking done by Chinese and citation was there but you think it is not acceptable. It is very hard to see how we have to add citation but I have it. I will try getting it done. It is already catching my eye that you are Chinese writing even bout Comfort lady, which is a Korean matter. Why though? I just like the fair history not propaganda. You are not respecting Americans giving such one sided information however, American academic knows that all about Nanking since they are the one asked China. American also knows clearly abut Okinawa battle which you, Chinese wrote like Okinawa is your island and that is fake because America was there.

Firstly, I should state that while I do some editing on Chinese topics, I do not feel any need to restrict my topics to any one area. In the event you continue to edit, I would like once again to re-emphasize the WPs relating to sourcing, such as WP:NOR, especially the sections on reliable sourcing (which I strongly suggest you read), and WP:GEVAL, particularly the distinctions between "false balance" and "impartiality."Zmflavius (talk) 14:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)