User talk:Studentoftruth

Welcome!

Hello, Studentoftruth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! ITAQALLAH 16:11, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Houri

Is this edit also yours? Mind you that in any subject, the primary content comes first and the refutation and alternative interpretations come second. Sex was the heading, so thats what the section will talk about first. You dont start refuting somethinf first -that comes later.--Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 20:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete "age who never had sexual intercourse with anyone" ? Please dont think no one is watching your edits. They will be reverted if you're removing sourced text. --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 20:58, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have enough knowledge of the situation to make judgments or take a side. Theology isn't my area of expertise. For me the only thing that matters is accuracy, neutrality, good sources and critical contributions made with the help of experts (if needed and if possible). That's why I used the expert tag in the article. I presume you should call experts from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam and discuss all points of view with them.

P.S. - Why did you made edits on the talk page of "Houri" changing the place where I wrote my comments? I think it is not correct according to WP policy. It could be wrongly interpreted in a couple of different ways.

Best regards, and good luck. Page Up 00:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on Houri

Hi, Studentoftruth, firstly I commend you for your work on this article. You have been able to add some very useful information and expand the article as it stands today. However, please assume good faith towards Rune X2 and other editors. Based on your work and responses, I can see that you are a very knowledgeable person but would request that you remain civil in your discussions. → AA ^(talk) — 13:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Arrow740 22:07, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Ma malakat aymanukum

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ma malakat aymanukum. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Walton^One 11:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: You were reported to the administrators' noticeboard for violating the three-revert rule. I have decided not to block you this time as you're a fairly new user, but please stop edit-warring, otherwise you will be blocked. I recommend that you seek dispute resolution for your content dispute on this article. Walton^One 11:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop flooding that page with tafsir quotes. That is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Arrow740 21:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]