User talk:Studentdocvik

This user is a student editor in Texas_College_of_Osteopathic_Medicine/2021-22_TCOM_WikiMed_Directed_Studies_(Period_21) .

Welcome!

Hello, Studentdocvik, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:04, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Work Plan

For the article on vacuum aspiration, I would like to go in and come up with a better-worded definition of the procedure. I think that using some newer resources would be helpful for this. I would like to have some resources to back up the safety of the procedure because currently, this is a topic that is addressed, and statements are made without resources to back this up. I would also like to update the section on benefits over D&C. This is another section that could use some better resources. I don't think there are currently any changes to make to the description of the procedure itself, but this is something to maybe reevaluate later. I think the updated definition and resources for the safety of the procedure are the most important focus for now.

Studentdocvik (talk) 22:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

The additions you made to this article were great, Studentdocvik! It really made the article more well rounded and complete. The only thing I could possibly think of that may need to be improved is updating the sources that are used -- a few of the references cite Baird (2001) and another source from 1994 (Mahomed). Other than that, keep on doing what you're doing. It's looking great! ChefJeffLi (talk) 20:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your feedback! I have been unable to find more recent articles with the supporting information from the older articles you listed, unfortunately. This is definitely a growing field of research. I added in newer resources where possible, but I felt it would be good to leave the older ones as well for context! Studentdocvik (talk) 16:49, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]