User talk:Stub12718696

Stub12718696 is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon.

Broad On (Ѻ, ѻ)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Broad On (Ѻ, ѻ), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://allrss.com/wikipedia.php?title=Broad_On. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Nubby, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Tlesher (talk) 23:25, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, such as those you made to Chi (letter), it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:29, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ̐

A tag has been placed on ̐ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -IcĕwedgЁ (ťalķ) 05:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Stub12718696

A tag has been placed on User:Stub12718696, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:User:Stub12718696|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 22:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editing etiquette

Hi. Please use edit summaries in your edits, and please don't revert my changes without explanation. —Michael Z. 2008-07-01 22:17 z

Hi. I've cited a reference at Uk (Everson 2007) which clearly attests to the uppercase form as Оу. Please don't revert again.

And I suggest that you use the edit summary and participate in discussions, to save everyone some trouble, including yourself. —Michael Z. 2008-07-02 03:40 z

Stub template on user page

Hi Stub12718696. I hope you don't mind that I subst'ed the stub template on your user page and removed the category link; I did this so that your page doesn't turn up in a category of articles for editors to expand. Grutness...wha? 00:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would you be able to stop putting {{hangon}} on your user page? It flags the page as requiring administrator attention, which it really doesn't. Cheers Kevin (talk) 10:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Hi, stub.

You've caused a little trouble recently with your experiments to your userpage. Putting templates (they're the things that {{look like this}}) on the page causes it to appear on lists of pages that we like to scan over to check them out. If you want to experiment, try here: Wikipedia:Sandbox. Okay? - Richard Cavell (talk) 07:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again

Hi, stub.

If you want to test templates, you're welcome to do so. Go here: Wikipedia:Sandbox, and you can play with them as much as you like! - Richard Cavell (talk) 03:17, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You put the {{semiprotected}} template on your userpage. This doesn't stop unregistered users from editing your userpage - if you want that, you'll have to ask an administrator like me to protect it for you. - Richard Cavell (talk) 03:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've semi-protected your userpage for you. - Richard Cavell (talk) 04:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for vandalism

Spurious requests to delete articles are considered vandalism. So are unwelcome edits to other editors' personal pages, such as you did on Microƶoƶo's page. I'm blocking you for one hour. —Michael Z. 2008-07-26 15:18 z

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.

Becoming an Admin

How do you submit your request for becoming an admin???

You follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/nominate. Note that accounts with less than a few thousand edits are not likely to pass, and the process can be difficult, as others may dissect all of your contributions. Kevin (talk) 03:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage move

Please don't move your user and talk pages to the name of a nonexistent user (i.e., User:Stubby-Nubby). If you want to change your username, go to Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the directions there. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 23:12, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, no more page moves (such as Cyrillic alphabet to Cyrillic) without discussion and consensus. You've been blocked once already -- you need to learn to work with other editors instead of making unilateral moves, or you may get blocked again. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:18, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

NawlinWiki (talk) 23:24, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking Stub12718696

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stub12718696 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a error edit on Yæ and I need to revert it back.

Decline reason:

That's not a reason to unblock you. If you wish to explain the error, it can be corrected. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 21:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The error is it is Mordvin ~~Kurdish~~ orthography representing [jæ]. Problem solved.

"Tidle" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tidle. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 6#Tidle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 18:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]