User talk:Stuartandtheave

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article We Are Young Money, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Red Flag on the Right Side 18:01, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Rebirth (Lil Wayne album). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Red Flag on the Right Side 18:01, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Marshall Mathers LP. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Red Flag on the Right Side 18:08, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to 21st Century Breakdown, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Red Flag on the Right Side 18:12, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Driving Me Crazy (Sam Adams song)

A tag has been placed on Driving Me Crazy (Sam Adams song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 20:04, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reported at WP:AIV

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

EdJohnston (talk) 22:43, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Tennessee (disambiguation), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 01:59, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to The Blueprint 2: The Gift & the Curse constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 02:44, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Love the Way You Lie. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 19:08, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Love the Way You Lie, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. If you don't explain your unreferenced additions, it looks exactly like vandalism. Please stop your disruptiveness. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 02:29, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rebirth article

I reverted your edits to this article's infobox, as they appeared to contradict WP:Albums policy on chronology, which states "In a studio album article, the chain (for most artists) should include only other studio albums, excluding live albums and compilations; these other types can also have their own separate chains" Dan56 (talk) 04:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Memories (David Guetta song) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 03:20, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of $O$

A tag has been placed on $O$ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 03:26, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of $O$ for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article $O$, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/$O$ until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 21:47, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 5 (Die Antwoord EP) for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article 5 (Die Antwoord EP), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5 (Die Antwoord EP) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 21:48, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs on $O$/5 EP

Hey, Stuartandtheave. If you're interested, your input on the proposed deletion of the two Die Antwoord releases would be most appreciated: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5 (Die Antwoord EP) and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/$O$ --Kaini (talk) 20:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

also, i don't think an article on enter the ninja is going to last. you can't say things like 'it's expected to chart better once...'. --Kaini (talk) 20:43, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Watch the Throne. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yvesnimmo (talk) 01:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Watch the Throne, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Yvesnimmo (talk) 01:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to No Love. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 02:51, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Eminem discography. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Just providing a reference citation DOES NOT make something reliably sourced. First, the reference has to be a reliable source. Second, and this one is important, too, is that the source has to actually say what you need it to say. It has to mention the topic of your claim. It has to really support your statement. Please be more careful when adding content to Wikipedia. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 23:53, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Yves (talk) 22:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC) I have reverted your edit here, because Watch the Throne is an EP while My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy is a studio album. They do not go in the same chronology. Thank you. Yves (talk) 22:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Recovery (Eminem album), you may be blocked from editing. Please stop making things up. Stop guessing. Stop adding material without reference citations to reliable sources. Stop making edits which lack edit summaries. Stop fighting against the other editors here, and please make an effort to work with us. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 16:10, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to 8 Mile (soundtrack). Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. What were you trying to do? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 00:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Eminem discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. In your last edits, you added some certification without a reference citation, garbled the table you were working in, either noticed the table was messed up and decided to leave it, or just didn't bother to check your work, and again, you provided no edit summary (diff for last edits). — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 03:18, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Eminem discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 00:38, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The R.E.D. Album, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Both your sources you provided are unreliable. Only add info to stable articles if you can provide a reliable source. ie (HipHopDX.com, DJBooth.net, AllHipHop.com, Mtv.com, Billboard.com ect. STATic message me! 17:50, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

hey collaborate with me on this page Bad Meets Evil (song). You can help by adding song theme or song meaning. thanks

License tagging for File:BadMeetsEvil.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BadMeetsEvil.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:WritersBlock.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:WritersBlock.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:SecondPlaceCover.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:SecondPlaceCover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Second Place

The article Second Place has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to pass WP:NSONG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 01:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:SecondPlaceClean.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SecondPlaceClean.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:SecondPlaceCover.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:SecondPlaceCover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:04, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Roycesuccess.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Roycesuccess.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WritersBlock.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WritersBlock.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Second Place

The article Second Place has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSONG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 05:40, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Second Place

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Second Place, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. SummerPhD (talk) 05:41, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The S.O.U.L. Tape

The article The S.O.U.L. Tape has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable mixtape, per WP:MUSIC.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 06:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I saved a copy of this article for you http://speedydeletion.wikia.com/wiki/The_S.O.U.L._Tape James Michael DuPont (talk) 06:42, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:KnockMadness.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:KnockMadness.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]