User talk:StrongALPHA

Project class

At Talk:Jason Jorjani you wrote in the edit summary "I don´t understand what the concept of "start" means in relation to WikiProjects".

See the grades in Content assessment. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 16:14, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Till Lindemann

Why don't you read the source properly? This is written in the source:[1]. KurtR (talk) 20:27, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah to her recollection, the whole article that was originally cited describes how she felt she couldn’t remember anything that happened that evening, as if she had been drugged, woke up with bruises, I read better than simply properly. StrongALPHA (talk) 20:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes correct reading and correct presentation is very important in such a delicate area. KurtR (talk) 21:21, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Friedrich Sieburg and Nazi Party membership

Reading the de.wiki article, I don't see an outright statement that he joined the party, and the cited sources are print, so there is no way to immediately verify the statement. At any rate, because the assertion that he was a Nazi was added to en.wiki with no reference cited, I have removed it from the article. —C.Fred (talk) 11:45, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It´s under categories "NSDAP-Mitglied". I´m not trying to make it controversial, only that many people would like to know that. I would assume that German wikipedia would be more reliable on the issue, so I will just make the request back to you that I would like to restore the statement. My sense is that this comes from the book by Peter Longerich "Propagandisten im Krieg"? StrongALPHA (talk) 11:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The German Wikipedia is not reliable, at least not as a direct source. If it comes from the Longerich book, then that's what needs to be cited—but you need to verify that it's in the book, not just go on "your sense" that the book reports it. —C.Fred (talk) 12:11, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

World War III#Russian invasion of Ukraine: 24 February 2022 – present

Thought I'd best explain why I have condensed the info regarding the September 2022 missile strike in Poland and Russia's New START withdrawal etc into 2 sentences - the reason being that I have found the section as it is is getting too long and unwieldy, especially when compared to past close calls to a WW3 that are featured in the article. Pdhadam (talk) 07:09, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dugin

Hi StrongAlpha. As things stand right now, Dugin is a disambiguation page, and we don't need the duplicate Dugin (disambiguation) (though it should exist as a redirect). If you think that Aleksandr is the primary topic for "Dugin", you should probably start a requested move that looks something like:

Dugin → Dugin (disambiguation)
Dugin turned into a redirect to Aleksandr Dugin

It would help, in that request move discussion, to bring evidence that Aleksandr is commonly referred to mononymously as "Dugin", as well as usage/long-term significance primary topic evidence. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:07, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have once again redirected dugin to "aleksandr", but it should be really clear for anyone who wanted any other page dedicated to anything eles by the same name where they can go. StrongALPHA (talk) 17:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have never, and still haven't, redirected dugin to "aleksandr". Do you perhaps think you are doing so by adding the hatnote? You would need to actually change the redirect target at Dugin to Aleksandr Dugin. If you don't do so, the hatnote is incorrect. Note that I am not suggesting that you do so, as such a move would be controversial (for example, I would be likely to oppose it) and should only proceed via RM consensus. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see your interest in defending the status quo on this issues, which I´ll discuss with you when I have the time, currently the page simply has a link to the disambiguation page. StrongALPHA (talk) 17:21, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Put simply that page about the surname although it function as disambiguation page, it presents itself as an article about the surname, which is not what anyone is using it for and therefor should both renamed and everything about it doing with the name itself should be changed. The reason I wanted to redirect "Dugin" to Aleksandr Dugin is because of what I suspect that majority of people who are typing that into the search bar are looking for Aleksandr. Could you maybe delete the page about "Dugin", and put it´s conents into Dugin (disambiguation). StrongALPHA (talk) 17:31, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your fix at Aleksandr Dugin's hatnote. I very mildly oppose having that hatnote there per WP:NOTAMB, but it's less problematic than the redirect template. Unless there's a showing that there exists some primary topic for "Dugin", the dab page should stay at Dugin and Dugin (disambiguation) should be a redirect to it (see WP:NOPRIMARY). I neither agree nor disagree with you about the introductory material at Dugin about the surname, so I wouldn't stand in the way of your trimming it. It does need to at least mention "Dugina", which redirects to that dab page and explains one of the list items (Darya). Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Richard Hanania

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Richard Hanania, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:18, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Islamofascism

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Islamofascism, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Haoreima (talk) 23:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello! I'm Remsense. Your recent edit(s) to the page Noam Chomsky appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. the article cited explicitly qualifies the indirect evidence for the claim, which any citation on wikipedia also needs to do, as well as addressing chomsky's response. WP:BLP issues are no joke, and require special care. Remsense留 12:01, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dugin (disambiguation)

Hello, StrongALPHA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dugin (disambiguation), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Scottish Greens

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Scottish Greens, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:03, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dugin (disambiguation)

Hello, StrongALPHA. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dugin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ja Rule

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ja Rule, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cenk Uygur Presidential Campaign 2024

Hello, StrongALPHA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cenk Uygur Presidential Campaign 2024, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cenk Uygur Presidential Campaign 2024

Hello, StrongALPHA. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cenk Uygur Presidential Campaign 2024".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]