User talk:StreaksOnTheChina

August 2008

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:Spuh. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 00:24, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding to me in a civilized manner. I admit fault in having failed to hold my tongue, and I agree with you that my comments toward Spuh and Kww were perhaps more pointed than they ought to have been. Nevertheless, I hope that we can work together to inject a little bit of level-headedness into arguments that have--I hope you will permit this characterization--devolved into little more than name-calling and gnashing of teeth. StreaksOnTheChina (talk) 05:25, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

You should be aware that there is an ongoing discussion about your edits. Toddst1 (talk) 00:55, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weight discussion

I would like to point out that I simply prevent vandalism to articles ... if Spuh had found a real discussion of the weight problem and added it to the article, I would not have responded. What I responded to were deceitful edit summaries, improper use of multiple accounts, and insulting language.
Kww (talk) 10:45, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your efforts to combat vandalism, and I concede that some of the remarks I made were perhaps overly hostile. However, there have in fact been many discussions of Raven's weight problems carried out in interviews and articles in perfectly legitimate publications. I completely agree that Spuh took the wrong approach, and I too am guilty of foul play, in that I logged on with two separate accounts to generate phony support for a certain position. However, Spuh and I are by no means alone in believing that this topic should be admitted for serious discussion. I hope that, once one of the many available articles is produced (either by me or by anyone who is aware of the issue), it will not be immediately assumed to be vandalism. Thank you for your attention, and please accept my apology for having antagonized you, Kevin. StreaksOnTheChina (talk) 18:58, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chalkieperfect (talk · contribs)

Please do not weigh in on the same topic as both StreaksOnTheChina and Chalkieperfect. Doing so violates our sockpuppeting policies. If you continue to do so, both accounts are at risk for being blocked.
Kww (talk) 14:21, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Toddst1 (talk) 15:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]