User talk:Strattonshire

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, so it has been blocked indefinitely.

Newyorkbrad 20:25, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Strattonshire (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, this is not what it seems to be. You see, I registered this account in hopes that I would contribute to Wikipedia with only the best best best content. But almost immediately, my account and password was hijacked by that blasted Ichträgtkeineschuhe, and thus, he continued by making whatever edits he pleased. That is probably why you associate the two accounts. But I can assure you this, I have since changed my password and I KNOW that this user will not come back, why would he? This account has served his bad-faith purposes. So I ask kindly, that I may be unblocked so that I can make positive contributions, something I was not able to do yet. I am gennuine in my wishes to keep this encyclopedia great, if only I am given a chance. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Abusive sockpuppeteering proves this user cannot be trusted. Only parent account eligible for unblock consideration. — Yamla 21:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|Please unblock me, I have nothing to do with the sockpuppets you speak of, and am telling the honest truth. Once again, I have changed my password and everything, and I could prove all this 100+% if I am given another chance. What can I do to prove I have only the best intentions? One must assume good faith, you know.