User talk:Stratford1616

Welcome!

Hello, Stratford1616, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! IAKenny (talk) 02:08, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SlitherioFan2016, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

PopCapGamesFan (talk) 02:36, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked, again

@Bbb23: Oh, foiled again! How am I going to show Wikipedia that I can be useful? Stratford1616 (talk) 21:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stratford1616 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe I should be unblocked because I want to come back and be more useful, and now I have had more experience with accessibility issues and I will not change the colour scheme again. *I believe I should be unblocked so I can do some WP:RCP and give every article a boost on becoming a featured article. That said, I usually just edit pages for minor grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors, whenever I happen to notice them. I also remove obvious vandalism. But as far as I can tell, I don't make changes just to reflect my personal tastes. :There are also a few topics in which I have a special interest and I may edit content on pages related to these topics. In particular, if I am aware of recent research which allows an article to be updated, I will add the information. *I feel as if there is a block affecting me because I have only changed the colour scheme to a non-compliant one, and not making useful contributions. So, I got blocked as WP:NOTHERE. But I want to prove that I CAN be useful, that's why I am asking to be unblocked. *As a side note, if you do accept this request, please unblock my original account rather than me. Stratford1616 (talk) 21:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your continued sockpuppetry shows you have zero intention of ever contributing productively. Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 21:59, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.