Jump to content

User talk:Stralitzia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Stralitzia, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Pgallert (talk) 09:46, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Namibia's north eastern parks

[edit]

Thanks for the links and the encouragement. I will be updating the Nkasa Rupala (Mamili) and Mudumu national parks pages too, and want to create a page for the project NamParks. As stated, I have 24 years experience with working directly with Namibia's national parks and reserves. Any assistance, pointers, ideas welcome! --Stralitzia (talk) 13:00, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Namibia has quite a number of articles already but biodiversity, geology, flora, and fauna generally lack behind. Please see Outline of Namibia, particularly the section on Environment of Namibia: Every link that is red represents an article that is yet to be written. If you see any chance to start one of those, please go ahead. Feel free to ask for assistance with any challenge you might face. Cheers, Pgallert (talk) 13:10, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{Help me}} Greetings, I am back and very rusty after the holidays! I want to continue getting info up and running on north eastern parks. I also would like to create a stub or article on the NamParks project. This is my current area of expertise. Any further guidance would be great, particularly about Wikipedia etiquette as I am still a bit overwhelmed.

In my spare time, I will later endevour to update and ensure correctness of all national park entries. I helped produce the national parks brochures and the MET's State of Protected Areas Report.

I am happy to answer any questions. regards --Stralitzia (talk) 12:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stralitzia, for new articles it is best to create them in your user space. That is an article which starts with User:Stralitzia/ (with a forward slash), and then has the intended article name. For NamParks for instance, it would be User:Stralitzia/NamParks (simply click on the red link to create the page).
As long as you work in your user space, you don't have to worry about Wikipedia's 1000 rules (but: no copyright violations, even there). Let me know if you have a draft ready, I'll then look over it. Cheers, Pgallert (talk) 13:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! Will be getting to it later in the week. I really appreciate the assistance. --Stralitzia (talk) 16:56, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I have written updated text for Mudumu National Park. Can you access my sandbox? I would love your comments. References have not been inserted as I dont seem to be able to access the Ministry of Environment and Tourism's home page! I am using Chrome. I look forward to your comments. --Stralitzia (talk) 13:32, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stralitzia, that is a good draft which will make a nice article. A few hints on how you can further improve it:
  • Formal aspects:
    • Headlines should not be capitalised, except for the first letter
    • There is too much white space on the page. As a rule of thumb, you basically never need the <br/> tag, and in the source code, two line feeds are almost always sufficient (one line break to end the line, and one line break to produce one empty line in the source)
    • If you mention units you may also cater for readership that is used to imperial measurements like pound or mile. I use the {{convert}} template for that. Check out your sandbox' source code, I have implemented it in the first paragraph for the area of the park.
    • If you want to use an image or a map, you must upload it first. For that, the image must be under a free license like Public Domain, or it must be your image, your own, private creation. If the map is suitable in this respect (I doubt it, maps are usually under copyright) you can go to http://commons.wikimedia.org, there is a wizard available to upload files. Alternatively, if you have GPS coordinates you can project them onto a pre-existing map. I have done that for you, check your sandbox.
  • Content aspects:
    • Wikipedia's content needs to be referenced. For every paragraph there should be at least one. There is no problem to reference sources that are not online.
    • Due to concerns about advertising on Wikipedia, most editors do not like to see urls in the text. If it is an important entity, just link it, even if it does not exist, as you did with NamParks Project. If it is not important, just leave out the url. Of the main entity described in the article, the institution's web site can be included under "External links".
    • The references need more than just a url. Write down whatever you can find, publisher, author, pagination, date, title, and so on. I like to use the {{cite}} template. It works like that:
<ref>
{{cite book
 |last=Nujoma
 |first=Sam
 |title=Where Others Wavered
 |publisher=Panaf Books
 |year=2001
 |isbn=9780901787576
 |page=25
 |url=http://books.google.com.na/books/about/Where_others_wavered.html?id=8wZzAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
}}</ref>
But again, this is a very good draft with only minor glitches. Keep up! Pgallert (talk) 14:43, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you so much for the input. I really appreciate your assistance. I will look through in the next day or two. I have references to MET documents but their website is not working, so thanks for the tip on referencing. I can add all of those.

Next up - Nkasa Rupara National Park!

bye linda--Stralitzia (talk) 14:51, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have added references but some have gone a little haywire! What am I doing wrong? On the map front, MET's NamParks project has a good series of maps that they say are not copywrited. I will attempt to post soon.--Stralitzia (talk) 12:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Linda, references consist of two parts: One where you place the footnote, that's the <ref>... </ref> section in the text, and once where the list of references should appear, usually at the end of the article. It is common to use the {{Reflist}} template, I have put it in for you. There can be parameters after the Reflist keyword: {{Reflist|2}} makes a two-column list, {{Reflist|30em}} makes columns of 30 characters of the size of the letter "m".
I'll also show you how to combine several references, maybe tomorrow. Good work, The article looks almost perfect now! --Pgallert (talk) 05:32, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing the reference section. I am puzzled as to why some show as separate references, whereas 3, 8 and 23 repeat themselves. What am I doing wrong? Also, do you have a suggested template for the NamParks page? It is a project for the MET. --Stralitzia (talk) 07:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Linda, you mixed up a few of the parameters in the references, that's why some of them do not properly show (for instance, they have no title). The normal case is to summarize references, and not to repeat them in the references list.
  • To give the title of a publication, specify the parameter |title= in the {{Cite}} template.
  • To give a reference a name, write <ref name="My reference name"></ref> instead of just <ref></ref>. This way, you only need to write the entire reference (<ref name=A>{{cite ... }}</ref>) once. For every further occurrence of the same reference, you just write <ref name=A/> --- without the {{cite}} template, and without a second <ref> tag, but with a forward slash at the end.
  • I have implemented reference summaries for two of the references --- it also makes the source code much shorter. There is one remaining reference that occurs several times: Ministry of Environment and Tourism (2009). Mudumu National Park. Windhoek, Namibia: Ministry of Environment and Tourism. pp. 4. I leave that one for you to practice. Don't be afraid to lose content that you already wrote. You can always revert back to an older version by clicking on the "history" tab (right next to the "edit" tab) and picking an older version.
Happy editing! Pgallert (talk) 19:59, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Linda, I think the article is now far beyond what's expected of a newcomer, and ready to go to article space (at the moment, it is still in your sandbox). I have applied a few "final touches", according to Wikipedia custom:
Let me know if you want to move the article (using the "move" button on top) from User:Stralitzia/sandbox to Mudumu National Park, or if I should do that for you. Cheers, Pgallert (talk) 19:24, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, thank you, thank you! I really appreciate yor patience and excellent assistance. I will give the moving a go, otherwise will contact you. Nkasa Rupara is next! Best wishes --Stralitzia (talk) 05:09, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Linda, I just realised that the link to Mudumu National Park is blue, that means that the article already exists. Moving is therefore not possible. The way to join the two articles is a so-called history merger; this can only be done by administrators.
I suggest that you look through the existing Mudumu National Park if there is something you could use (the picture, the paragraph about the birds, the National Parks template at the bottom). Once you are ready I can request a history merger. Cheers, Pgallert (talk) 05:37, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peter, I looked at the page initially but it seems it was put up by a tour operator and is not very accurate. That's why i did it from scratch. I actually wrote the State of Parks entries for MET and have spent a lot of time making sure that that info was as accurate as possible - checking with field staff, MET directors etc. I have maps that i will put up soon. Meanwhile, would it be possible to load the Wikis?

Best wishes linda --Stralitzia (talk) 16:51, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Linda, there is nothing wrong with writing something from scratch. It is just that because of WP's licensing conditions, the current version of the article has to be kept as a kind of an archive, and your new version has to "correctly" overwrite the existing one, in a way that one can still figure out who added what. I have now requested such a merge, that should not be a problem at all. Happy weekend, --Pgallert (talk) 12:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


thanks, Peter. Happy weekend to you too! --Stralitzia (talk) 08:57, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Linda, the history merger has now been performed, and your version of the page is live. Congratulations, and let me know if I can be of further help. Brgds, Pgallert (talk) 13:40, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hardap Nature Reserve has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hardap Nature Reserve. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:26, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hardap Nature Reserve (November 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 08:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[Talk page stalker:] @SwisterTwister: I'm not sure I can follow you here: A national park, proclaimed 50 years ago, and 250 sqkm in size? That in my book is a pretty strong indicator of notability. @Stralitzia: Several of the references are too unspecific to find them. They don't need to be online but a bit more information would be good, e.g current ref #2, where 'State of Protected Areas in Namibia' could be the title of the book/brochure, or the title of the article in the book. I have merged the occurrences of the two important refs just now. Click here if you want to see how to do that. Cheers, Pgallert (talk) 09:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @SwisterTwister and Pgallert - I am on my way to Wiki Training in Joburg and will receive some guidance on how to improve this. So thanks for the input - should have a beautiful new draft with citations ready for you at the end of the week! Stralitzia (talk) 10:07, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, I couldn't make it to Joburg. I had been asked to conduct this training but have other commitments until December 4. Say hi to all participant, please! --Pgallert (talk) 11:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 30 November

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Skink?

[edit]

Hi, I mentioned the unknown lizard in front of my Saffron door. Here it is (click for a larger picture). Looks skinklike to me. Any suggestions? Cheers, --Gereon K. (talk) 07:59, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: The more I look at it the more I suspect Trachylepis striata (the "African striped skink" resp. the "Striped skink"). --Gereon K. (talk) 17:00, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, agreed! It is a pretty common one. Stralitzia (talk) 10:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hardap Recreation Resort

[edit]

Hello. I just found that there are articles about the Hardap Recreation Resort on the German language and the Ukrainian language Wikipedias. Well, not very good ones, though. :-) See de:Erholungsgebiet Hardap and uk:Рекреаційний курорт Гардап. --Gereon K. (talk) 20:02, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Found this at last and hope this is finally the right place to reply. How should I go forward with the Hardap article? It has been on the back burner for ages so I would love to complete it and move on to the next one! Stralitzia (talk) 14:49, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

[edit]

Sorry to have reverted your edits, it was a rollback misclick. Kpgjhpjm 13:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Stralitzia&oldid=1076539879"