User talk:Stormie/Archive12

Archive pages:

Improper close of CFD

I believe you improperly closed the discussions to delete Category:Recent books and Category:Recent films. The deletion policy says "Deletion and undeletion are performed by administrators based on policy and guidelines, not personal likes and dislikes." The deletion guide for administrators says "As a general rule, don't close discussions or delete pages whose discussions you've participated in. Let someone else do it." You should have let someone else do it — especially in light of your recent personal attacks on me. --Pixelface (talk) 19:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed nearly unanimously with 46 support, 1 oppose, and 0 neutral. Thanks for supporting me!

-Djsasso (talk) 17:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 22:25, 3 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

RfA Thanks

Dear Stormie, Thank you for voting in my RfA, which closed successfully with 34 support, 2 oppose, and 0 neutral. I appreciate your support! I promise I will wield the mop wisely, and do my best to improve Wikipedia. -- AKeen (talk) 15:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1400s

I looked at what you had made for this article in your sandbox, and I have undeleted the history of the article. Please feel free to move it over at your convenience. 1 != 2 17:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 12 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Condor Laucke, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

---- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 15:24, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Howard

Hi,

Thanks for your assistance involving the Matt Howard deletion review. I have created the content to be moved to Matt Howard. It is located here: User:NatureBoyMD/Matt Howard. Thanks again! -NatureBoyMD (talk) 01:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WRG

Thanks for the restoration of the Wargames Research Group page - yes I started plyingtheir rules way back in the 70's - 3rd or 4th edition I think......and still am. I'll work on referencing some articles for the page. --Aloysius the Gaul (talk) 00:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Rollback tool

Dear Stormie,

I have been a casual Wikipedia editor for some time, and have recently become interested in fighting vandalism.

I would like to roll back the article Mardi Gras in order to remove the full name of a person whom was insulted as part of a vandalism that I witnessed while watching the "recent changes" log this morning. I have no idea who this person is, or who the vandal is, but I have already left stern warnings on the vandal's talk page.

The vandalism occurred in this edit.

Thank-you!

VegKilla (talk) 16:21, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the rollback tool, but I don't know how to use it! The bot already changed the page back, so if I rollback what the bot did, then it goes back to being the vandalized version. So then I thought maybe I'd just roll it back twice, but that just rolled back my rollback.

I need to rollback like 3 edits at once.

Is there a tutorial on how to use this thing? Would you mind looking at the history of the article and let me know what I am doing wrong?

I think the rollback tool is the tool I need. What I am trying to do is I am trying to permanently remove this edit, because even though there is nothing wrong with being a homosexual, I am sure whoever that is does not appreciate having their full name on Wikipedia, even if it is just in the edit history.

Thanks for your help! VegKilla (talk) 23:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then what does the roll-back do that is different from undo?

So is there any way to permanently remove this edit from the history logs so that not even a record of the edit description remains? VegKilla (talk) 00:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any time and act of vandalism adds a full name to the encyclopedia, that edit and the edit summary should be speedily and permanently removed from all logs. Where can I bring up creating a policy like that?

RE: Talia Madison/Velvet Sky

Hey. I was just on my way to voice my opinion, but it seems like the article has been recreated. While I would have liked to see a few more independent sources in the article, I do agree that she is notable enough now (especially compared to when the article was originally at AfD) that she should have an article. Thanks for informing me of the discussion, though. Nikki311 04:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change the height/weight use. We do not use that height/weight conversion template for the Infobox Wrestler template. In the future, I suggest checking an infoboxe's page to see what you are supposed to to (I notice people do these same mistakes in video game templates). TJ Spyke 23:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know someone had vandalized the Infobox page. Thanks for letting me know. There was no official discussion, it was just the way we used it for a long time, but once in awhile someone tries to change it without discussing it first. TJ Spyke 00:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose we could put a link to a site that does automatic conversions (it's what I use). Part of the reason now is that for some reason there is a bot that is replacing of the weight templates with one that includes the wegiht in Stones (an odd weight system only used in Ireland, and even in Ireland its use is declining). TJ Spyke 00:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hawks10's genre changes

Hi,

Since you gave User:Hawks10 his final warning about unsourced genre changes, he has made another 50+ changes. Just letting you know that I have reverted them and blocked him for 48 hours. --Stormie (talk) 03:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the block and notifying me, Stormie. Cheers! Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 10:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Richards Article

Not trying to promote myself. And Randy Richards is being promoted only inasmuch as anyone else on Wikipedia. But this is all irrelevant - the article contained nearly 20 citations, and at least 2 meaningful secondary sources WITH independent verification. What more could anyone want? Malakai Joe (talk) 01:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adriano Bulla deletion review

Are you calling the British Library Bulla's 'suckpuppet?' [1][2] [3]

Maybe living in the US youn don't know that the British Library is apponted by OUR Queen as the official registrar for publications? Maybe living in the US you don't know that greatworks.org.uk is possibly the most authoritative poetry website in the UK? We in the UK call this 'slagging off without reference to evidence'. How do you? TonyBrit (talk) 11:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican Hot 100

A few song articles had bogus Mexican Hot 100 chart positions; I went and removed them to save you a little trouble. Going through the user's edit history, there're probably a few more bogus Mexican Hot 100 chart positions thrown in. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Date changes in Kerry Sibraa

Thank you that you correct my mistakes.--Joseph Solis in Australia (talk) 09:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Malakov affair: New data

Dear Stormie:

As you will recall about two months ago you & I disagreed on the validity of a Daniel Malakov encyclopedia article on Wikipedia. Many WP:Notability and WP:BLP claims were made by yourself and other gentle administrators. Try as I could, there seemed way to convince you that the murder of Daniel Malakov was a significant event requiring a Wikipedia page. The page was deleted. No discussion on the merits was permitted, IMHO, by the "Administrator echelon."

In view of the above, I wish to direct your attention to a New York Times article as follows:

February 9, 2008
Man Accused of Killing Dentist Exchanged 91 Calls With Dentist’s Wife
By CHRISTINE HAUSER and DARYL KHAN

You are free to go to nytimes.com and read the article, but perhaps the salient details are as follows:

Those details about the killing of Dr. Malakov on Oct. 28, 2007, emerged Friday from an indictment and at a news conference held by police officials and prosecutors.

As the families of both Dr. Malakov and his estranged wife looked on, Dr. Borukhova, 34, was arraigned and pleaded not guilty on Friday to charges including first-degree murder and second-degree conspiracy in an emotion-filled hearing in State Supreme Court in Queens. Mr. Mallayev, 50, faces similar charges.

The defendants could each be sentenced to life in prison without parole. They were ordered held without bail until their next court date, Friday.

At the time you folks decided to ditch the article, this information was not available. Now that it is, and more information ostensibly is to come out as the NYPD and AG begin to make their case in court, I want to know whether you will reverse your position and support an article on Daniel Malakov, or alternatively "Murder of Daniel Malakov."

If not, what would you need to see to support such an article? If you demand a conviction, then I plan to hold you to your promise.

Eileivgyrt (talk) 16:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

World of Warcraft revert

You stated the information contributed was "non-encyclopedic". An encyclopida is simply "A written composition of informative articles arranged alphabetically." I believe the point of Wikipedia is for users to supbmit and/or edit aticles of any number of subjects in an open-forum style think tank if you will. I am sure u are aware of how much vandalism wikipedia recieves on a daily basis so it surprises me to the highest extend when a legitimate editor inputs information onto an articles to make it better and expand some vague subjects within. Because world of warcraft does not have a bunch of sub-articles and redirects, there is nothing wrong with someone adding information about specific classes as they can. I am working with 3 other high wikipedia contributors to get world of warcraft more expanded sections as far as specific class information and history. Considering you have not contributed at all to this article I'd like it if you did not revert legitimate information posted in the article. Like I said, in a wikipedian world with so much vandalism, why wouldn't someone jump at the chance to have constructive editing? Ziros (talk) 15:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Grant (rugby player)

Hi. If he's notable, why don't you create a stub article about him? --Dweller (talk) 07:52, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

typo

youthinks right :p ..--Comet styles 00:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

anah aevia deletion

hi, your explanation would make sense if the article as you saw it was complete though in fact I was in the middle of typing it.

one ep and a myspace is not all there is, two eps, a full length, national tours and one member who went on to join an internationally touring band on a major record label (still remains on roadrunner records). Clint metal (talk) 06:32, 14 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clint metal (talk • contribs) 06:27, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tim keim

WHy did you delete "the man's" page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amf7rf (talk • contribs) 06:22, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PlanList

Why is PlanList supposed to be deleted? It is very similar to page Remember_The_Milk which is not deleted. It seems to be unfair, doesn't it?BanterCZ (talk) 11:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would be sufficient reference from customer website?BanterCZ (talk) 11:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page deletion

Do not delete pages from another user's user space. Please restore immediately. Guido den Broeder (talk) 11:29, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. I forgot the slash... my apologies! :) Guido den Broeder (talk) 11:38, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for RomexSoft

An editor has asked for a deletion review of RomexSoft. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Fuegoazul (talk) 12:41, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RomexSoft

Just letting you know that when you protected this from creation you (probably inadvertently) chose to protect it at the autoconfirmed level only. This doesn't really stop anyone as they only have to wait for four days after registering. I've redeleted and fully protected the page now. Stifle (talk) 09:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wookieepedia AFD

I removed the AFD and rescue tags on Wookieepedia after you closed the AFD discussion: hopefully they weren't being kept up for a specific reason. Cheers, —Silly Dan _(talk) 02:06, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay.

I wont recreate an.ymore. Besides, I only recreated it once —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgt Pikachu5 (talk • contribs) 07:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]