User talk:Stopfe die Schokolade

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stopfe die Schokolade (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have done nothing to deserve such treatment

Decline reason:

It isn't possible for me to review this request fairly without also reviewing the contributions you've made on other accounts. If you think you should be unblocked, please put the request on your original account's talk page. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:40, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You seem to think I am someone else. Who, I would like to know, do you think I am? I signed up for my first and only account yesterday. I am sorry if there is a witchhunt you are involved in. That is too bad.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stopfe die Schokolade (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This person thinks I have other accounts. I challenge that and ask that this account be specified. This is not fair treatment

Decline reason:

This has been provided on your user page. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 00:25, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you decide to request unblock again, it will be helpful if you can explain how you happened, as your first edits, to leap into the middle of an ongoing edit conflict, making the same edits as a user known to use multiple accounts and in the same writing style. If someone you know asked you to make these edits, it's only fair that you know that he isn't allowed to edit by proxy, either. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stopfe die Schokolade (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, I see you think I am Professor Todd. No I am not and this is very strange. okay, I went to the corporation page for research, noticed that it was poorly written, looked at history, saw a lot of good edits that had been reverted, read the discussion, decided to repost some edits and write some of my own. I think the edits that I posted are obvisouly correct. you have a problem of an edit war, but this is not my fault. I was reading and making opinions for myself, plain and simple. As for writing like another person, is Professor Todd German? you people are on a witchhunt and I am in the middle, I am afraid

Decline reason:

You are an obvious sockpuppet, and "Stopfe die Schokolade" does not even make any sense in German. Sandstein 14:43, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|Sorry, but just saying it's obvious is not a reason. And who cares if my syntax if off. I like the name and study German as does my instructor. Anyhow, I am not a sock puppet, but your article on the corporation sucks. Anyone looking at it will see it sucks, makes no sense, and is help hostage. I will appeal to be unblocked until this is resolved correctly.}

You have now had your request reviewed by three independent administrators. In this fourth request, you actually acknowledge that you are editing on behalf of the blocked user, a possibility I advised you to address after your first request. Further review of this block is not likely to lead in any change in the block; your instructor is not allowed to edit Wikipedia, not even by sending students to edit on his behalf. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]