User talk:StoneyBellingham

Welcome

Hello, StoneyBellingham, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

AfC notification: Draft:Martin Stone (lawyer) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Martin Stone (lawyer). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:08, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon I'm not sure how I correct the disambiguation problem - can you help? I am also working on the "breezy style" ----StoneyBellingham

The disambiguation does not require any action on your part. I have already disambiguated the draft by renaming it from Draft:Martin Stone to Draft:Martin Stone (lawyer). When the draft is reviewed, if the draft is accepted, it will be moved into article space. The accepting reviewer then should add a link to the lawyer to the disambiguation list, Martin Stone (disambiguation). That is a comment that is for the information of future reviewers, rather than anything you need to do, other than rework the tone. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nightenbelle can you please help identify which sources are considered not reliable. As Martin Stone was in business pre-digital age I have used only searchable articles and corporate annual reports. Thank you in advance for your thoughts. User:StoneyBellingham

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Stone (lawyer) (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This page appears to have been written to praise its subject rather than to describe the subject neutrally. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view. If this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, it may be nominated for deletion. You may ask for advice about the tone of articles at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Stone (lawyer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Martin Stone (lawyer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StoneyBellingham! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Martin Stone (lawyer)

Hello, StoneyBellingham. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Martin Stone (lawyer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Stone (lawyer) (July 8)

{{subst:Afc decline|full=Draft:Martin Stone (lawyer)|cv=no|reason=v|details=|reason2=|details2=|comment=Several sources do not support the paragraph they are attached to, and are in {{WP:OR]] territory for what they do support. Sources do not established notability outside of his associations|sig=yes}}

User:Nightenbelle can you please help identify which sources are considered not reliable. As Martin Stone was in business pre-digital age I have used only searchable articles and corporate annual reports. Thank you in advance for your thoughts. User:StoneyBellingham

Your draft article, Draft:Martin Stone (lawyer)

Hello, StoneyBellingham. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Martin Stone".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]