User talk:Stoneagestudy

Hello Stoneagestudy! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Smee 19:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Attribution • Neutral point of view • Notability Conflict of interest • Autobiography Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Citing sources • Footnotes Image use policy • Copyrights • Fair use External links • Spam • Vandalism Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry What Wikipedia is not • Deletion policy The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article Perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Smee 19:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC).

Etymology of the names of India

Well, thanks for using such as a word as 'please' as you did in the editor notes, it suggests that you may take notice of other people. As for Wikipedia guidelines, I have read them, and I am happy that I am doing the right thing. I have also given reasons for my changes from the beginning. Originally these reasons were placed rather succinctly in the editor notes, and this is quite acceptable. I've now taken the time to place them in a bit more detail on the talk page of the article, but you still haven't answered them. Since you have not provided any counter-arguments to my reasoning, and I see no reason for me to change my reasoning, I feel justified in reverting your changes back. References are only part of the story, what is added has to be relevant to the subject. Please comment further in the talk page of the article. Thank you. Imc 22:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)