User talk:Stone/Archive2

G2ZT

Hi Stone, is this drawing Image:G2ZT.svg correct? I couldn't get access to a drawing online so I'm going by my understanding of your description. --JaGa^talk 22:05, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Lars Fredrik Nilsson

No problem, it was my pleasure. Regards, Fred-J 12:05, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rose

Hello! Just wondering for the reason behind these[1] edits[2]. Because Rose is an episode and a character, the disambig page falls under the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who. You seem to have removed a large portion of the links on said page, including the link to Rose Tyler; I was just wondering why. Thanks - weebiloobil (talk) 07:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! - weebiloobil (talk) 09:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lambert Heinrich von Babo

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lambert Heinrich von Babo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 20:09, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. --Flash176 (talk) 16:05, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

	The Chemistry Bond Star
	Thanks a lot for all the help on the chemical element articles, and especially for niobium and hafnium. Keep up the excellent work and we will get the entire periodic table blue & green! Cheers, Nergaal (talk) 01:36, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bounty for Germanium paid

See Wikipedia:Bounty_board/Expired_and_claimed_bounties#Claimed_bounties

Dear Daniel Mayer,

This email confirms that you have paid Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. $25.00 USD using PayPal.

It may take a few moments for this transaction to appear in the Recent Activity list on your Account Overview. This credit card transaction will appear on your bill as "PAYPAL *WIKIMEDIA".

Payment Details

Item Price: $25.00 USD

Total: $25.00 USD

Order Description: One-time donation

Item/Product Number: DONATE

The following options were included with this payment: Anonymity: public

Comment: Bounty: paid for making Germanium GA ; en.wiki WikiProject Elements' users Nergaal, Stone, Cryptic C62

Buyer: Daniel Mayer

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Periodic Table by Quality.SVG

Thanks for uploading Image:Periodic Table by Quality.SVG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:40, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GAN: niobium

You should take care of the two ^{[citation needed]} tags before anyone starts reviewing it. Nergaal (talk) 06:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hide the two sentences. I found no ref for the claims, although they are plausible.--Stone (talk) 07:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will work on this soon on Talk:Niobium/GA2. Nergaal (talk) 18:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note: whenever you have the time and energy to do it, for the German references you use, if you add the parameter "language=German" then you could also try to give the English name also/instead (or write it at least in parentheses after the German title) if you could translate them well enough. Nergaal (talk) 15:47, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Niobium. Cheers! Nergaal (talk) 00:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HAAA??? I am not sure what you mean, but if you actually care, then go ahead and submit/renominate/rewrite the nomination. I saw that nothing has been happening with the article for some weeks now so I just threw it at FAC. Wtf? Nergaal (talk) 06:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have to give a talk in the beginning of december and a design review of the Exomars Mars Organic Molecule Analyser is sheduled for mid of december limiting my spare time for wikipedia to nearly nothing. I think FAC is a lot of work and I will be not be able to help. A look in a ref or a short answer will most what I can do.--Stone (talk) 08:30, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gallium selenide- GaSe

I have done a little to this article - and found your references on the talk page- fantastic- thankyou!--Axiosaurus (talk) 14:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On Monday I have access to the articles and than I can help. We built a laser for ExoMars which uses KTP an BBO for doubling frequencies, but I was not aware that you can do it also with IR.--Stone (talk) 14:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FAC:germanium

there are two more things to solve thich I couldn't do: the IR detecting capability, and the temperature limit for the superconductivity. any ideaas how to solve these? Nergaal (talk) 20:48, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not answering, but I am on holiday and ill, so I will try to work on the problem as soon as possible!--Stone (talk) 10:08, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Judson they seem to produce Germanium IR detectors.--Stone (talk) 22:08, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the FAC is stalled because of only these 2 issues. Nergaal (talk) 01:13, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GAN:Hafnium?

If you still care, the article may go up for GAN once all the paragraphs are referenced. I will take a look at this article in the future to copy-edit it. Ah, and one more thing: the name of the elements are not capitalized in English - it is not German. The only nouns that are capitalized are the names of people or organizations, and the names of countries, languages, and its people - so Germany, German language, and Germans. Nergaal (talk) 01:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would be nice to get it to GAN!I will be there to help!--Stone (talk)

It still has a few ^{[citation needed]} tags. Nergaal (talk) 20:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Got them all! --Stone (talk) 22:30, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Whenever I have time I try to help. Nergaal (talk) 23:23, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Image-Boron-trichloride-chemical.png

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Image-Boron-trichloride-chemical.png, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Image-Boron-trichloride-chemical.png is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Image-Boron-trichloride-chemical.png, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:10, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Krypton

Just to let you know I reverted your last edit to Krypton I think you mistakenly reverted my edit back to a vandalized version. A new name 2008 (talk) 21:13, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry and Thanks!--Stone (talk) 21:27, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Georg Zundel

Hi, in case you are interested, someone asked at Talk:Hydronium#Zundel_Cations if "someone" could create an article about the discoverer of the Zundel cation. There is an article in German at de:Georg Zundel. Besides the need for a translation, I suppose the German article could use a check for neutrality and related policies since it was apparently written by Zundel's son (for which we should be thankful, because he donated a picture and everything!). --Itub (talk) 10:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for starting the article! --Itub (talk) 09:28, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

After reviewing all the most recent edits to element articles, I am very glad to see that you are continuing to improve a great many of them. Your contributions are greatly valued. Please keep up the great work! :) --mav (talk) 18:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I try! Thanks!--Stone (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

World map svg additions

Hello! Unfortunately, despite how good that map looks, I still don't know that much about SVG, I would like to know how to add text myself for maps; the map is pretty much the only SVG I've done, and I just learned how to do that stuff by initially working in Inkscape and then figured out how to make coding changes in a text editor. I would suggest maybe adding text using Inkscape or another SVG graphics editor (should be simple enough), the only drawback would be the fact that the editors add extra code to the image (which is why I do updates via text editor now) --Canuckguy (talk) 14:07, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amino acid

I think I've dealt with all the points you raised in your review, could you take another look at the article? Tim Vickers (talk) 19:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Tim Vickers (talk) 17:56, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:World Bromine Production 2006.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:World Bromine Production 2006.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ni

Heya Stone

Didn't realize we were both working on the article at the same time. Any suggestions on what I can help with? --Rifleman 82 (talk) 06:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nearly everything. I have the history refs and will try to improve the section, but the niobium FAC is more urgent.--Stone (talk) 08:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, help?

stone, thanks a lot for your consideration... i don't know where you live, but it's 4am here, and i'm going to bed. could you help me with the question i had on the image and the questions i have on the talk page on tin if you have some time? It would be good to get that out of the way before i finish the expansion i'm doing in the next couple days. thanks a lot!

NittyG (talk) 09:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its 11:00 here! in Göttingen. I will have a look!--Stone (talk) 09:57, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

fluorine

with your much appreciated edit under fluorine, i have incorporated that material under organofluorine (which i worked on heavily today). i am going to remove the whole section on the biological uses of fluorine. i think the biological section on fluorine should be F₂ dominated. (therefore it shouldn't exist.) the dental thing is a biological use of fluoride not fluorine, IMHO. just wanted to say thank you for your effort and let you know where your efforts are. please feel free to incorporate the 12 organofluorines as of 2002 info but i haven't because it appeared uncited (though it is likely from one of the two sources you looked up). you can see my bias towards F₂ on the talk page. eventually, i think nearly all the pharma, etc. etc. chemicals should be synthesized into a very short section. the article reads like an advertisement for organofluorines to me. Thanks. -Shootbamboo (talk) 23:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a section biological roll in all elements which are trace elements and ultra trace elements! So there should be one there to. Look at Iodine and bromine if you want. Only Oxygen, Nitrogen and Hydrogen have a biological role as an element, so if you want, try to errase the bilogical role of carbon from the carbon article and see what will happen there!--Stone (talk) 06:11, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i will reinstate the section. -Shootbamboo (talk) 03:02, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Niobium

Sorry, I was away, and very busy since I resumed editing. I have commented on the FAC, but may be unable to respond at a later stage. =Nichalp «Talk»= 07:42, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting progressively busy, may be in and out of action till February. :( =Nichalp «Talk»= 09:05, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Messages

I think it was very strange that you left me a message just as I was getting to your talk page. Vuerqex (talk) 14:00, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Misspelling of easily

~~You misspelled the word "easily" as "easyly"! You're such an idiot! You can't even spell!~~ ~~Vuerqex (talk) 14:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC)~~[reply]

I'm sorry about that. Please forgive me. I just have an annoying habit of getting angry over simple typographical errors. Vuerqex (talk) 02:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the wishes Harald! :) =Nichalp «Talk»= 14:54, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]