User talk:Stntinoo

Leave a message at the tone.

Welcome!

Hi Stntinoo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! —Bagumba (talk) 00:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Teaching.com

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Teaching.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:15, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stntinoo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So i was blocked because i have a similar userpage, my account was created 2 days after a blcoked account, i left a message on you and Bagumba's talk page, and because i requested a page for deletion. Hey! Im just going off what you said (Indeffed based on clear behavioral evidence, including requesting undeletion of a page created by a previous sock (Nitro Type), similar userpages, and posting on my and Bagumba's talk pages ([1], [2]). Account was created two days after the last sock was blocked. Requesting CU for sleepers. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:08, 29 April 2021 (UTC)) I dont know why u think that but ok... I just want to be unblocked, soo. The block isn't nessecary because i didnt do IT! Literally all i did was a 4 simple things and that makes me a suspected sockpuppet? Are you guys targeting new users for blocks because you dont trust them? And even if i was which im not, im not doing anything to harm WIkipedia. SO why is it that im blocked. Stntinoo (talk)

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 01:05, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Christiancool123 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Christiancool123. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:00, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]