Jump to content

User talk:Stmarom/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What does the article (or section) do well? (Here, consider the contribution’s tone—is it neutral? Is it well sourced? Does it offer useful reference information?) - Very good! I honestly like the depth of information you've added. The tone is also satisfied and same with the requirements. I do enjoy the hyperlinks, however, I didn't see many citations as well? I do see a list at the bottom but be sure to add it in wherever necessary as a citation!

What changes would you suggest overall? (Be as specific as possible in your suggestions.) - Honestly, I think it's very solid, you have a ton of information, if you wanted you could add maybe a reference picture, but other than that, you've accomplished the task and the information is all there What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? - Again, just citations, but you're good to go otherwise! - BRIANNA CHEW



Peer Review

What does the article/section do well?

I really like how you added a background section. It really helps paint a picture for why/how solar energy storage came about. The entire section is definitely neutral and offers an abundant amount of  relevant information regarding the topic. 

I have no idea why that was added inside a box and I don't know how to change it ^

What changes would you suggest overall? I think I would separate the previous storing methods that were explored in a separate section. It's a little confusing on what methods were used and what were abandoned?

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? The most important thing you can do is to add citations throughout the article because I don't think that I saw any? I know you used references because of the references list you added on the bottom, but you should still add in text citations throughout your writing as well.

Choi.kel (talk) 19:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]