User talk:Stjohn1970

Welcome!

Hello, Stjohn1970, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as National Garifuna Council, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! role^player 10:20, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of National Garifuna Council

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on National Garifuna Council requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. role^player 10:20, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your message

Parthasarathy Temple, Triplicane

The article is already present in Wikipedia here: Parthasarathy Temple, Triplicane. --Anbu121 (talk me) 16:06, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Satvata

A tag has been placed on Satvata requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Albacore (talk) 18:37, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vedavalli_Amai

Hello Stjohn1970,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Vedavalli_Amai for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Itemirus^{Message me!} 16:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Manual of Harmonics

Hello Stjohn1970,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Manual of Harmonics for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. OccultZone (Talk) 16:15, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Hanuman. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PepperBeast (talk) 14:31, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did not make an edit to the page itself. I merely commented in the talk section.

Talk is not "unconstructive", nor is the freedom of expression.

It seems however that my comment has already been removed, so there is nothing to 'contest' Stjohn1970 (talk) 08:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk pages are for discussion of how to improve the article, not for "freedom of expression", much less absurd "prove me wrong" challenges. You may want to familiarise yourself with the talk page guidelines. PepperBeast (talk) 13:29, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]