User talk:Stimpy9337

Welcome!

Hello Stimpy9337, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- SoothingR 16:39, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are considered unproductive. Please make useful contributions in the future. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Also, see the tutorial. Thank you. ●R EDVERS ^{HELLO●EMAIL●DOINGS} 17:02, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during June 4 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Erebus555 18:04, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

14th June 06

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- Steel 22:41, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This message is regarding the page List of the simpsons episodes. Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! -- JLaTondre 12:47, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Atlantic Records

Your recent edit to Atlantic Records (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 22:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- Infrogmation 08:07, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article Angela Anaconda, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
If you do not want to receive bot-generated messages on your talk page, please consider using the nobots template on your user talk page

Messing about

Don't add pretend templates to pages, like you did at Sandbox, and please don't give into temptation and vandalise pages. Do something more constructive. Grace Note 07:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please edit constructively only. You do not "just have to" make joke edits. There are many places on the internet for jokes and sillyness; Wikipedia is not one of them. You have had more than enough warnings. You will be blocked from editing if you continue making junk edits. -- Infrogmation 08:39, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Geniac 00:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Seraphimblade 06:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made to Thunderbirds (film)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Stimpy9337! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bexample\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 17:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Leslie Burke.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Leslie Burke.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Mad166.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mad166.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 20:24, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stimpy9337

A tag has been placed on Stimpy9337, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an user page from the main/article space. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. GJD 14:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Your anus, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rehnn83 ^Talk 08:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fucking milk

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fucking milk, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Fucking milk. Skomorokh ^incite 00:14, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Visit to Anthony

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article A Visit to Anthony, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 05:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Friedwormsposter.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Friedwormsposter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:B0000D0YWB.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:B0000D0YWB.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --11:37, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jesse Aarons

I have nominated Jesse Aarons, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Aarons. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 01:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Leslie Burke

I have nominated Leslie Burke, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Burke. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 01:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Leslie Burke

I have nominated Leslie Burke, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Burke (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TallNapoleon (talk) 01:24, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jesse Aarons

I have nominated Jesse Aarons, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Aarons (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TallNapoleon (talk) 01:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of ZAPX

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is ZAPX. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZAPX. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Tupid and Stuid

Orphaned non-free image File:B0000D0YWB.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:B0000D0YWB.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:52, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Croizee listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Croizee. Since you had some involvement with the Croizee redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:03, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Internet movie" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Internet movie and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 5#Internet movie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]