Jump to content

User talk:Stim07

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stim07, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Stim07! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC)


Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Stim07, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:06, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiktok in India (August 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at TikTok. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This would not qualify for its own article in Wikipedia. If there is something notable about its use in India, I would suggest adding it to the existing page for TikTok.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 05:58, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thanks for your contributions! Simtastic01 (talk) 07:54, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slayy Point (August 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that the appropriate notability criterion is satisfied. In particular, this draft does not appear to indicate that WP:NWEB is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NWEB for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

This draft does not show significant coverage of the channel by third parties.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Roller26. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to [[:ICFAI Business School Hyderabad The ICFAI Foundation for Higher Education]] seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kindly check India'stop university pages like University of Delhi and pages of top management institutes like IIM Ahmedabad and IIM Lucknow to see how to write a college page with WP:NPOV. Roller26 (talk) 12:35, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roller, Thank you for your edits and comments. I am assuming good faith, and will try to improve the article in line with your suggestions. It will be great if you can demonstrate what you want by editing the article. After all, this is what Wikipedia is all about -- a collaborative platform. Stim07 (talk) 13:34, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Stim07:, I have edited both the pages and removed all the non-NPOV material and the tags. IN IBS school page, there was no need to reassert that its one of the top business school in India, let its ranking and accreditation speak that. In the university page, it was to reliant on IBS accreditation and ranking. If both of them are notable in their own right to have stand alone age then the content should differ. You can have a look at the institute pages (IIM-A, IIM-L (its recognized as a WP:Good Article), University of Delhi) to see how even India's top institutes and universities don't mention that fact per se. You can also have a look at WP:College_and_university_article_guideline to further enrich your participation here at WP. In case of any further queries kindly ping me here on my talk page. -- Roller26 (talk) 12:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roller26, Thank you for your time and efforts in editing and improving the articles. Your advice is also well taken. You are a great resource! Stim07 (talk) 13:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Persaud

[edit]

Hi. Please note that this person fails WP:NCRIC as he has not yet played in a T20, first-class or List A match. Please do not create biographies for cricketers who have not yet played in at least one match. Under-19 matches do not count towards notability. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryan Persaud

[edit]
Notice

The article Ryan Persaud has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hasn't played first-class, List A or Twenty20 cricket, so fails WP:CRIN inclusion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StickyWicket (talk) 08:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ryan Persaud for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Persaud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Persaud until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StickyWicket (talk) 20:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ahmed Hassan (Maldives cricketer) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmed Hassan (Maldives cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Hassan (Maldives cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please confirm you have read the notability guide for cricketers

[edit]
As per my earlier message on your talkpage, above, please DO NOT create articles for cricketers who do not meet WP:NCRIC. If you continue to create articles for cricketers that don't meet the notability requirements, this could be seen as disruptive and lead to your account being blocked. Please reply here to state you understand this. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I confirm. Stim07 (talk) 18:45, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 19:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ICFAI Business School Hyderabad

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ICFAI Business School Hyderabad, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 1292simon (talk) 02:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhavin Bhanushali (November 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
REmove links to social media from the article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nightenbelle (talk) 17:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Renée Mauborgne moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Renée Mauborgne, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Themis Medicare for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Themis Medicare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Themis Medicare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. noq (talk) 14:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, the article has been created as there are similar articles on other Indian Pharma companies. So, I feel it should not be deleted as it has reference value. Meanwhile, the article has also been improved and it can benefit from other experienced editors improving it over time. Thank you. Stim07 (talk) 06:50, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Renée Mauborgne (November 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Curbon7 (talk) 23:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Stim07, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Draft:Renée Mauborgne have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Curbon7 (talk) 23:34, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Curbon7, Thanks for your developmental feedback and comments. This article is a special case and may have (in parts) content similar to that in Wikipedia article W. Chan Kim. Renee and Kim are both notable for their collaborative work. Something as simple as a Google search will make this obvious. It's only fair that both the people have their Wikipedia pages (here,the female collaborator does not have a page which I was trying to remedy. Wikipedia being a collaborative platform, some help in this regard from experienced editors such as you will be very helpful), though there will be overlaps. Anyway, your comments about copyright are well received. Stim07 (talk) 03:06, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't do this again

[edit]

You've been changing American-style dates to British-style dates in articles (e.g., [1]). The Wikipedia Manual of Style says that dates should be styled according to the national variety of English most associated with the articles. Ergo, articles on American topics should use American-style dates. Please don't change them. MarconiCheese (talk) 13:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Thanks. Stim07 (talk) 13:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Renée Mauborgne (November 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is a promotional press release , not an NPOV encyclopedia article
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 03:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Covidivider

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Stim07. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Covidivider, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 21:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Covidivider

[edit]

Hello, Stim07. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Covidivider".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 01:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Renée Mauborgne has been accepted

[edit]
Renée Mauborgne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 11:08, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Stim07&oldid=1073319675"