User talk:Stillhrithik

Hello, Stillhrithik, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for registering an account.
I hope you like the place and decide to stay.


	Introduction 5 The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help Tips	How to write a great article Manual of Style Be Bold Assume Good faith Get adopted

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC.
You can also place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to your userpage. That content has been deleted. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

I encourage you to help build the encyclopedia. Thank you, and happy editing. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Hrithik Roshan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. BollyJeff | talk 13:25, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hrithik Roshan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Please watch your tone on this article. You are making a mockery of Wikipedia by turning this article into pure fancruft. Please read the good biography articles of other Indian actors such as Priyanka Chopra and Shah Rukh Khan to see how it should be written and read the guidelines at WP:BLP. You must use quality sources too, not other editable sources like IMDB. BollyJeff | talk 13:23, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It would do you good to read the links provided for you at the top of this page. Wikipedia is not a free for all. There are rules and methods of editing correctly. Information must be properly sourced, especially in biographies. There are sources that good and some that are considered bad. The guidelines help you figure out which is which. Biographies cannot be loaded with praise like a fan site. This is an encyclopedia. I am sorry that I have to keep reverting you, but you need to take some time to learn the proper protocol for this site. Please be patient and try to learn. BollyJeff | talk 19:45, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree with the other editors who commented about your changes at Hrithik Roshan. What you wrote there was unduly promotional, lauding Roshan without providing any real information, based on rather dubious sources. Worse, you copy-pasted from those sources, a copyright violation. That's not acceptable and will be reverted. Huon (talk) 12:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Hrithik Roshan, you may be blocked from editing. Acctually its more an issue of WP:FLOWERY and [1] (definition 4) than personal analysis. BollyJeff | talk 19:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 21:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

January 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Shii (tock) 18:49, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stillhrithik, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Krimuk|90 (talk) 05:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stillhrithik. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 13:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Logo of Stillhrithik, The Golden design Used in This, Dec 2014.jpg

The file File:Logo of Stillhrithik, The Golden design Used in This, Dec 2014.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal file. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]