User talk:Stickymatch/Archive 3
Question
[edit]Hi Stickymatch, I’ve edited my biography by removing some of the false content that has been possibly added by some disgruntled readers. Those are just false allegations, not proven. There was no enquirer or action taken due to the reason that such allegations were made with wrong intent. Thank you so much for understanding this issue. I’ll add some more information in my biography in the days to come , which will be based on real facts.
- The allegations mentioned were clarified to be allegations, and just that- in addition they were properly sourced. In the future, please add information, such as the outcome of the investigations, and cite such information instead of removing it outright. Stickymatch 04:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Specifically, the edits made were have been there for some time, with multiple references that do seem to provide evidence. Such as in this article https://english.khabarhub.com/2020/13/75404/ and here is a direct link to the revision, for convenience https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rajendra_Chhetri&oldid=970928561 Finally, please try to WP:AFG when taking action on content.
IP User Edit Reversion
[edit]Hi, you notified an ip user about an improper edit they made, and the notice stated the edit would be reverted, but it hasn't been. I'd do it, but I've already reverted them and don't want to get dragged into an edit war. Could you take another look? Thanks - wolf 04:20, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- @wolf Sure, I'll get on that. Thanks for letting me know, I thought I reverted it. Stickymatch 18:08, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Looks like someone else resolved the issue, seems that everything is now in order. Stickymatch 18:11, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I encouraged them to self-revert as there was a discussion in progess and they did. (Not something you see often). Thanks for the reply and helping out. - wolf 18:28, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Of course, have a good rest of your day Stickymatch 21:06, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I encouraged them to self-revert as there was a discussion in progess and they did. (Not something you see often). Thanks for the reply and helping out. - wolf 18:28, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Looks like someone else resolved the issue, seems that everything is now in order. Stickymatch 18:11, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Bruh
[edit]You say I presented a non neutral view, but so did you when you said it is unjustified, that is the point I was trying to make, it shouldn't say justified nor unjustified if neutral is the approach you wanna take, whether you like it or not, 'anti-racist' pseudoscience is not a fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:BB2D:E101:2DA3:761E:E809:DA63 (talk) 00:35, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- @2A00:23C7:BB2D:E101:2DA3:761E:E809:DA63: Even in the argument that my edits were not 'truly' neutral, your modifications to the Discrimination page still would violate Wikipedia policies, specifically Wikipedia:NDP therefore; I reverted your edits. Stickymatch 00:40, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Sure but, saying whether it is justified or unjustified is both unneutral, it should just simply be making distinctions and treating someone differently on the basis of their ethnicity, religion or culture etc, it should be neither justified nor unjustified, I wasn't really trying to call it justified, only to prove a point, I know it broke the rules and I apologise, not my intentions but I was merely making a point of how ridiculous it is to say unjustified, when in reality, that's a subjective opinion.
- The biggest issue in this situation is the violation of WP:NDP, Wikipedia is not the place to attempt to prove a point. Have a good rest of your day/night. Stickymatch 00:53, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]@Thewolfchild: Could you please rollback the edits made by 2A00:23C7:BB2D:E101:2DA3:761E:E809:DA63|2A00:23C7:BB2D:E101:2DA3:761E:E809:DA63 on Discrimination that do not adhere with WP:NDP? Thanks! Stickymatch 00:52, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Suggestion Request
[edit]SuggestBot request Stickymatch 22:34, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Rollback granted
[edit]Hi Stickymatch. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (talk) 07:25, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Sounds good, thanks! Stickymatch 16:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Somalia
[edit]Hi, Nice to meet you at here! SomaliRepublic1991 (talk) 18:38, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hello! Nice catch on the Somali language page. Stickymatch 18:40, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 June 2021
[edit]- News and notes: Elections, Wikimania, masking and more
- In the media: Boris and Joe, reliability, love, and money
- Disinformation report: Croatian Wikipedia: capture and release
- Recent research: Feminist critique of Wikipedia's epistemology, Black Americans vastly underrepresented among editors, Wiki Workshop report
- Traffic report: So no one told you life was gonna be this way
- News from the WMF: Searching for Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: WikiProject on open proxies interview
- Forum: Is WMF fundraising abusive?
- Discussion report: Reliability of WikiLeaks discussed
- Obituary: SarahSV
The Signpost: 25 July 2021
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimania and a million other news stories
- Special report: Hardball in Hong Kong
- In the media: Larry is at it again
- Board of Trustees candidates: See the candidates
- Traffic report: Football, tennis and marveling at Loki
- News from the WMF: Uncapping our growth potential – interview with James Baldwin, Finance and Administration Department
- Humour: A little verse
Disambiguation link notification for August 21
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited You-Pick and Pick-Your-Own, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canned.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 August 2021
[edit]- News and notes: Enough time left to vote! IP ban
- In the media: Vive la différence!
- Wikimedians of the year: Seven Wikimedians of the year
- Gallery: Our community in 20 graphs
- News from Wiki Education: Changing the face of Wikipedia
- Recent research: IP editors, inclusiveness and empathy, cyclones, and world heritage
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Days of the Year Interview
- Traffic report: Olympics, movies, and Afghanistan
- Community view: Making Olympic history on Wikipedia
The Signpost: 26 September 2021
[edit]- News and notes: New CEO, new board members, China bans
- In the media: The future of Wikipedia
- Op-Ed: I've been desysopped
- Disinformation report: Paid promotional paragraphs in German parliamentary pages
- Discussion report: Editors discuss Wikipedia's vetting process for administrators
- Recent research: Wikipedia images for machine learning; Experiment justifies Wikipedia's high search rankings
- Community view: Is writing Wikipedia like making a quilt?
- Traffic report: Kanye, Emma Raducanu and 9/11
- News from Diff: Welcome to the first grantees of the Knowledge Equity Fund
- WikiProject report: The Random and the Beautiful
The Signpost: 31 October 2021
[edit]- From the editor: Different stories, same place
- News and notes: The sockpuppet who ran for adminship and almost succeeded
- Discussion report: Editors brainstorm and propose changes to the Requests for adminship process
- Recent research: Welcome messages fail to improve newbie retention
- Community view: Reflections on the Chinese Wikipedia
- Traffic report: James Bond and the Giant Squid Game
- Technology report: Wikimedia Toolhub, winners of the Coolest Tool Award, and more
- Serendipity: How Wikipedia helped create a Serbian stamp
- Book review: Wikipedia and the Representation of Reality
- WikiProject report: Redirection
- Humour: A very Wiki crossword
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]The Signpost: 29 November 2021
[edit]- In the media: Denial: climate change, mass killings and pornography
- WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2021
- Deletion report: What we lost, what we gained
- From a Wikipedia reader: What's Matt Amodio?
- Arbitration report: ArbCom in 2021
- Discussion report: On the brink of change – RFA reforms appear imminent
- Technology report: What does it take to upload a file?
- WikiProject report: Interview with contributors to WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers
- Recent research: Vandalizing Wikipedia as rational behavior
- Humour: A very new very Wiki crossword
The Signpost: 28 December 2021
[edit]- From the editor: Here is the news
- News and notes: Jimbo's NFT, new arbs, fixing RfA, and financial statements
- Serendipity: Born three months before her brother?
- In the media: The past is not even past
- Arbitration report: A new crew for '22
- By the numbers: Four billion words and a few numbers
- Deletion report: We laughed, we cried, we closed as "no consensus"
- Gallery: Wikicommons presents: 2021
- Traffic report: Spider-Man, football and the departed
- Crossword: Another Wiki crossword for one and all
- Humour: Buying Wikipedia
The Signpost: 30 January 2022
[edit]- Special report: WikiEd course leads to Twitter harassment
- News and notes: Feedback for Board of Trustees election
- Interview: CEO Maryana Iskander "four weeks in"
- Black History Month: What are you doing for Black History Month?
- WikiProject report: The Forgotten Featured
- Arbitration report: New arbitrators look at new case and antediluvian sanctions
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2021
- Obituary: Twofingered Typist
- Essay: The prime directive
- In the media: Fuzzy-headed government editing
- Recent research: Articles with higher quality ratings have fewer "knowledge gaps"
- Crossword: Cross swords with a crossword