User talk:Sticky v. Speedwagon

Template:Film Studio=

Your recent editing history at Template:Film Studio shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You seem to have no understanding of the categories adding them at random. Nor is is the template a complete list of production companies per Template talk:Film Studio#Not all production companies as that would as suggested at WikiProject Film discussion that the template be deleted. Spshu (talk) 13:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Major film studio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Fox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Glee and Disney

Sticky v. Speedwagon, it is not appropriate to add a Disney navbox to the Glee (TV series) article, since Glee was not a Disney franchise, and ceased being active long before Disney bought Fox.

It's also not appropriate because of how navboxes work. If you read through WP:NAV-WITHIN, you'll see that navboxes are intended to link articles to each other. That is, every article listed on a particular navigation template generally has the template placed on its page. In this case, you're simply throwing various Disney templates on pages when the templates don't include the pages you're adding them to, because, frankly, they don't belong on those pages.

At this point, if you want an exception to the above, you'll need to gain consensus from the Glee (TV series) talk page. (I think it's unlikely that you'll get it.) And you should probably think about removing the templates you've been adding from other pages where the articles aren't included in the templates (and thus don't belong there). Thank you for your understanding; it's important that navboxes are used as they were designed to be used. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Ghost Ship (2002 film), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 00:41, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Twilight Zone accident, you may be blocked from editing. Please read WP:CATV. Categories should only be applied when an article has verifiable content meriting their inclusion, not when the subject matter might become controverisal. The sheer frequency with which you applied them today demonstrates a lack of understanding. DonIago (talk) 00:55, 13 February 2020 (UTC)