User talk:Stevie sarah louise

April 2013

Hello, I'm Raintheone. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of Hollyoaks characters (2012) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Rain the 1 19:09, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 5 albert square. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Michael Moon (EastEnders), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 16:20, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at List of Hollyoaks characters (2013), you may be blocked from editing. Rain the 1 19:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tyler Moon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:29, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Josh Moon

Hello Stevie sarah louise,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Josh Moon for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Falkirks^Talk 14:14, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ste Hay, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rain the 1 16:06, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 16:43, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]