User talk:Stevie extreme

April 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Untitled The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild sequel, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. We generally don't capitalize names of seasons unless they're personified (MOS:CAPS). Quid Est Squid (talk) 18:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Untitled The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild sequel. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please read MOS:CAPS; we don't generally capitalize the names of seasons. Quid Est Squid (talk) 19:48, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks for letting me know Stevie extreme (talk) 20:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Cosgrove (Law & Order) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Frank Cosgrove (Law & Order), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 01:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Screenshot 2022-09-13 5.20.14 PM.png

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot 2022-09-13 5.20.14 PM.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Screenshot 2022-09-13 5.20.14 PM.png

Thank you for uploading File:Screenshot 2022-09-13 5.20.14 PM.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rocknrollmancer (talk) 01:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright and use

This is just to alert you to the fact that ALL images are considered as having a copyright that prevents Wikipedia from using and hosting any particular image UNLESS there is an obvious release, either in the form of a recognised licence (eg., Creative Commons) or by wording such as Copyleft or Public Domain. I cannot see anything that allows use of Simons'-produced images/videos in that they carry such a release. This is International Copyright Law. As a novice I don't expect you to know this, but please do not upload any more images unless an obvious copyright-release annotation is present at source.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 11:38, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Sorry as you know im new to this and I have went to the image and added a source and annotation to let people know where it comes from Stevie extreme (talk) 12:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to know how I can source the image on the main page Stevie extreme (talk) 13:49, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In short, you are not allowed to take images from the internet without sufficient licence or words to the effect that the image has been donated to the public for anyone to use being present (at the source URL). I've created a Talk page for the image; an administrator in due course will look at the image, it's use and the image Talk to decide if what you've added is acceptable. You don't need to do anything at the article TommyInnit.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 15:20, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Thank you In the future I will be more careful on how I handle images Stevie extreme (talk) 15:41, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've now added a different template to the image, to account for the details you added and to replace the maintenance template you deleted in this change. Please do not delete this new template; it has to stay in place until an administrator looks over the situation.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 15:34, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pacifc Drive (video game) (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires more reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pacifc Drive (video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pacifc Drive (video game) (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Continues to lack reliable secondary sources, see WP:SECONDARY

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pacifc Drive (video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:34, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Images

I left you a note in a separate section above. You've continued to upload what I surmise to be copyrighted images. I don't think you should be displaying Sonic, which would be copyrighted to Sega, although I see you've taken from (probably) a bona fide licensee. ALL images are copyrighted unless there is a specific release or recognised license.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 19:20, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was using it for my user page is that okay? Stevie extreme (talk) 21:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, not OK. Wikipedia, and it's sister project Wikimedia Commons (a repository of images and other media files) have to comply with international copyright law, as the pages are publicly visible. To upload a pic of Sonic under "own work" is a lie. Just because you right-clicked it then saved it then uploaded it doesn't make it your work. It is someone else's intellectual property.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 23:20, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I put it under own work I thought I had put it under not my own work if thats the case I will delete it Stevie extreme (talk) 23:25, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These Terms of Use permit you to use the Websites for your personal, non-commercial use only. You must not reproduce, distribute, modify, create derivative works of, republish, download, store or transmit any of the material on our Website, except as follows:

You may use it for personal needs.

You may print or download one copy of a reasonable number of pages of the Website or their content for your own personal, non-commercial use and not for further reproduction, publication or distribution.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 01:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pacifc Drive (video game) (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Announcements are not considered significant coverage. Should be a sizable preview, review, etc. If there are none, it is probably WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pacifc Drive (video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:32, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm Pilaz. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ludwig Ahgren, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pilaz (talk) 00:30, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I am not I have been using Wikipedia for awhile and forgot to add a source I will add a source Stevie extreme (talk) 01:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pacifc Drive (video game)

Hello, Stevie extreme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pacifc Drive (video game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pacifc Drive (video game)

Hello, Stevie extreme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pacifc Drive".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:44, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ken Takakura (Dandadan character) (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Artem.G was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

needs secondary sources to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ken Takakura (Dandadan character) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Artem.G (talk) 14:43, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stevie extreme! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Artem.G (talk) 14:43, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Frank Cosgrove (Law & Order)

Hello, Stevie extreme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Frank Cosgrove (Law & Order), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:04, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Frank Cosgrove (Law & Order)

Hello, Stevie extreme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Frank Cosgrove".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ken Takakura (Dandadan character)

Hello, Stevie extreme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ken Takakura (Dandadan character), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]