User talk:Stevesae

Welcome!

Hello, Stevesae, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! wia (talk) 17:38, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Stevesae/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^oh hello! 03:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — kikichugirl ^oh hello! 03:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Stevesae. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article SAE Institute, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:48, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Middlesex University Partnership

SAE Institute is accredited by Middlesex University, London UK. Students enrolled in a validated programme will receive a Middlesex award on successful completion of their studies. All BA/BSc (Hons) programmes are validated by Middlesex University. The relationship with Middlesex University has evolved and strengthened over the last 18 years with Accredited status being granted by Middlesex University in 2010 and the completion of a “Special Associate College” Agreement in 2011.

Copied from sandbox

Hi Kikichugirl, Your advice would be appreciate with the GuildHE entry that I would like to add to the SAE Institute page. Both links validate SAE's membership of GuildHE. Best Steve

I wanted to change President to CEO SAE Global (as below)to appear in the box on the right-hand side of the SAE Institute entry. Many thanks!

CEO SAE Global = Scott Jones

GuildHE SAE Institute became an Associate member of GuildHE in July 2013, one of the two recognised representative bodies for Higher Education in the UK. GuildHE have regular contact with BIS and HEFCE and are included in major Consultations on higher education e.g. the Browne Review of the future of Higher Education funding. GuildHE is represented on a wide range of external bodies

Stevesae (talk) 12:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]