User talk:Stevep2007

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Stevep2007

Thank you for creating James Heppelmann.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Portions sound a bit promotional/ resume-like, suggest tweaking that aspect.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Kathleen Mitford.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kathleen Mitford.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And again

The same image was re-added to the article by this account, even after you received the above warning. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 21:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MrsSnoozyTurtle: Please stop stalking - the uploaded images are properly licensed and documented. Please check.

Craig Melrose moved to draftspace

Please see log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 03:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI check

Hello. Do you have any association with PTC (software company)? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 22:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for the delay in replying. I have to change networks because W does not like my service provider. I only login occasionally.

In response to your question, I do not have a relationship with PTC. The digital transformation and IoT fields are constrained by limited expertise. There are just a few real experts. PTC, SAP, ABB, CISCO, and a few others have a concentration of this expertise. Next, I will add a couple of people from SAP, or ABB whose expertise, vs marketing is influential to the development of these fields.Stevep2007 (talk) 19:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft is improved with additional citations and tightening some of the language to focus on digital transformation and IoT expertise. User:MrsSnoozyTurtle Would you please comment prior to my submission? Stevep2007 (talk) 21:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steve. Thanks for clarifying that there is no COI issue regarding Craig Melrose of PTC. I have no objection to the draft being submitted at AfC. All the best, MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 22:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mrs. Snoozy @MrsSnoozyTurtle: the draft has been submitted for approval. Would you please remove the COI tag that you added Stevep2007 (talk) 17:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Heppelmann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Heppelmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Heppelmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 23:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mrs. Snoozy @MrsSnoozyTurtle: I am concerned that no one involved in the Heppelmann commentary has experience in the myriad of technologies that underlie Fourth Industrial Revolution aka Industry 4.0? People experienced in manufacturing technology are impressed by people like Heppelmann because of the complexity and depth of technical expertise needed to create and implement these new systems. Globalization has reduced the number of people in the product design and manufacturing field in the US. But given the paucity of editors who have product design and manufacturing experience, should not be caused to categorize this information as PR. Perhaps the assessment of this should be made by bilingual editors from Germany, especially the states of Baden-Württemberg where Stuttgart is located, and Bayern where München is located because these areas have retained product design and manufacturing expertise.Stevep2007 (talk) 21:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stevep2007. Thanks for the explanation. You are welcome to post that in the AfD discussion, of course. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 07:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with James Heppelmann. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:36, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I followed | Wikipedia's Policy in objecting to proposed deletion

Objecting

Shortcuts

To object to and therefore permanently prevent a proposed deletion, remove the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from the article or the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} tag from the file.^[1] You are encouraged, but not required, to also:

Explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion, either in the edit summary or on the talk page (the conreason parameter of the {{Old prod}} template is available for this purpose).
Notify the editors who placed or seconded the PROD by placing a {{subst:Deprod}} tag on their user talk page.
Add or modify an {{Old prod}} tag on the article's talk page, to prevent renomination under proposed deletion. It will then be listed at Category:Past proposed deletion candidates for tracking.
Improve the page to address the concerns raised.

March 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at James Heppelmann, you may be blocked from editing. An AFD is not a prod and you are not permitted to remove the template. VAXIDICAE💉 12:33, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Consider this a final warning this is wholly inappropriate and is nothing short of disruptive. You need to wait and let the AFD run it's course. If you continue to do this, I will request a block of your account. VAXIDICAE💉 12:37, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lastly, can you please explain how this is your own work and how you became the copyright holder? VAXIDICAE💉 12:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't explained your connection to the subject. How is this your own work? Please note that this is in lieu of leaving you a paid warning, so you really need to answer before you edit anywhere else. VAXIDICAE💉 19:47, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am asking you once more what your connection is, please do not edit elsewhere without answering. VAXIDICAE💉 15:56, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Craig Melrose (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CommanderWaterford were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Craig Melrose and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Craig Melrose, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:53, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stevep2007! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:53, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Craig Melrose

Hello, Stevep2007. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Craig Melrose, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Craig Melrose

Hello, Stevep2007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Craig Melrose".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:54, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

^ For files, a bot will automatically remove the {{deletable image-caption}} tags from pages where the file is used.

[Filesremove-1] For files, a bot will automatically remove the {{deletable image-caption}} tags from pages where the file is used.

[1]