User talk:Stevenshapiro

September 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Steven Seagal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 20:43, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Seth Rogen, you will be blocked from editing. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 20:44, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Jameskysonleefashion.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jameskysonleefashion.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 12:22, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

White people

Wikipedia is not your personal webhost. Please stop inserting your picture into the aforementioned article. Thanks, @Kate (talk) 04:23, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Stevenshapiro.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Stevenshapiro.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. @Kate (talk) 04:26, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on White people. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. @Kate (talk) 04:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Kate, just wondering why I can't put in pictures of a White person on the White People page, when there seem to be several pictures of Black people on the Black People page. stevenshapiro

File:WhitePerson.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:WhitePerson.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Momo san ^Gespräch 04:45, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Your pictures

Everybody else here seems to be very polite with you. The article is on my watchlist. I will treat further insertions of these or similar images as vandalism. Cheers! Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 04:48, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Stevenshapiro.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stevenshapiro.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 21:52, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

May 2010

Please stop. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did to Roman Polanski, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Off2riorob (talk) 18:42, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

How is it defamation to call a convicted child rapist of being a convicted child rapist? Your Polanski nut-riding is disgusting. Unfortunately for you, you're not 13 years old, drugged and drunk, so he's not interested. -stevenshapiro

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Seppuku.gif

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Seppuku.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 01:44, 31 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —mono 01:44, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

The file was used to vandalise the article Seppuku with nonsense. Delete it. Ttiotsw (talk) 03:11, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:WhitePerson.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:WhitePerson.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:46, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Seaman because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SummerPhD (talk) 01:35, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ora Washington with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:39, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aryan race, you may be blocked from editing. SummerPhD (talk) 01:52, 3 September 2013 (UTC)