User talk:Stevenmintz

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 20:48, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Brion Davis

Hi Steve, As a new user, you are unlikely aware of lots of Wikipedia rules for content. Articles must be written in a neutral manner and when claims such as Long recognized as the leading authority on slavery and abolition in the Western world appears in the text, it needs a reference. Leon Litwack and Ira Berlin and Eric Foner et al. write on slavery and abolition. What secondary references affirm that Davis is the leading authority?

There's a rule, e.g., that says No Original Research wp:or. This means you can not be the authority for assertions. You need a secondary source, a reliable source. wp:rs

In general, when facts are asserted, references must be shown. If you have any questions on how to do that, I'd be happy to make suggestions. Contact me on my talk page. Thanks. Skywriter (talk) 00:08, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, This is a question about the institute name which is not mentioned here. http://www.gilderlehrman.org/pressroom/news.php?headline_id=2142 This release refers to the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History but the Davis article says he founded a related institute. Would you clarify? Thanks. Skywriter (talk) 08:23, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Found the answer.Skywriter (talk) 09:10, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Mintz

Hello, Stevenmintz, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -

While your addition of material was fine, it does run into the Citing Sources, and Conflict of Interest. but, the linking to your work via google books in the article "is a good thing" Pohick2 (talk) 02:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Stevenmintz. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Steven Mintz, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Tornado chaser (talk) 15:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]