User talk:Steven Hipkins

Im new to wikipedia help me build my page.

January 2008

Hi, my addition of contents to the Girlfriend article was actually reverting what I consider your vandalism of removing content without any consensus to do so. Please gain support for such deletions on the talk page - you'll see I had previously responded to your statements there. Benjiboi 16:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POINT

Just what WP:POINT are you trying to make. BSA is the largest youth organization in America, by far. I found a ref that said so, can you find one that says no? One more and you're in 3RR violation. Not to mention your meatpuppeting with Gothgirl puts in vio already. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not threatening you, I warned you, that's what we're supposed to do vice edit war. Since you're a new editor, you may not know that. I'm not picking on her, she keeps altering the text to skew it. To say it's the largest boy organization distorts the facts. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GSUSA is NOT coed at all, but BSA is only in the older youth programs. What part of that do you fail to understand? — Rlevse • Talk • 23:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Boy Scouts of America. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Also please note that edit summaries like this may violate Wikipedia's No personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not the contributor. Dreadstar † 23:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Gothgirlangel1981 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:57, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The evidence of sockpuppetry looks very convincing. Indef blocking sock, and 24 hour block for the master. Dreadstar † 03:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]