User talk:StevenDB

Speedy deletion of QPR youth wing

A tag has been placed on QPR youth wing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. George D. Watson (Dendodge).Talk^Help 17:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on QPR youth wing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. StevenDB (talk) 17:37, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of hooligan firms

As I am sure you are fully aware, the source you are using, yet again, to add a firm to the list does not mention the firms name. It quite clearly states in the hidden text on the article that any firms added without being fully verified will be removed.Allyou need to do is find a third party reliable source that mentions the firms name. Also, the article you are using as I am also quite sure you already know, has been used over and over and each time has been removed. There is no point in continually adding the firm using that source as it will keep getting removed. All you need to do is find as I have said, another source that verifies the firms name and all this would stop, which again has been mentioned a number of times before.♦Tangerines♦·Talk 15:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have chosen to ignore my message above and have yet again added the firm in using the same invalid source. Your edits could be construed as vandalism now as you are ignoring messages left for you and ignoring wikipedia guidelines and policy. I will ask you once more to find a source that actually verifies the firms name, if you cannot do so then the only result will again be the removal of the firm.♦Tangerines♦·Talk 15:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for a short time. If you continue to re-add that information without sources the blocks will be longer. Black Kite 16:11, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of JackQPR (talk • contribs • block log • creation log). As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.