User talk:Stevecastro

Hello, this is an account that I have set up to suggest changes and possibly make small, uncontroversial, edits to articles related to EcoHouse Group. I'm aware that there are guidelines about editing pages if there is a potential conflict of interest, so I would like to disclose here that these contributions are made on behalf of EcoHouse Group and in consultation with them, and I intend to follow all of Wikipedia's guidelines, including those on WP:COI, WP:RS, WP:V and WP:NPOV, very closely. My aim is to work with and seek advice from impartial editors to make positive contributions to EcoHouse Group's article, hopefully leading to a much improved article. On any pages where I look for assistance, I will be sure to disclose my relationship to EcoHouse in the interests of transparency. If you would like to help me, please let me know. Thanks, Stevecastro (talk) 16:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Anthony Armstrong Emery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 16:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/EcoHouse Group.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 15:58, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Stevecastro, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

License tagging for File:Ecohousegrouplogo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Ecohousegrouplogo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

articles on organizations

I see you have been working on articles about business firms and their proprietors, and you have, very properly, been removing promotional material sourced only to press releases. (Remember though that such sources can be used for significant uncontested plain facts.) Please continue your efforts to make the article sound like an encyclopedia article, not a press release: rewrite material in an outline style, with short choppy sentences, combining them into paragraphs; remove unnecessary headings for individual paragraphs; don't describe minor charities as if they were significant; write compactly--for most of these articles, it is possible to remove a few words from each sentence without changing the meaning. And please make sure the article on the firm and that on the CEO don't repeat each other--if there isn't enough for two substantial articles, sometimes they are better combined. (I've made a few sample edits on some of these articles to indicate better what I mean). DGG ( talk ) 03:53, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]