User talk:SteveLo

Welcome!

Hello, SteveLo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some articles that you might find useful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - Darwinek 11:07, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Western Sahara-related edits

===>Round three If you refuse to discuss your edits and keep on inserting inaccuracies and Moroccan POV into the articles, I'm going to contact an admin to arbitrate these disputes, and that's entirely unnecessary. I'm not interested in getting into a revert war again over this. I've done it all before with Morocan editors pushing a Moroccan agenda, and I'm not intimdated by threats to blank pages. If you don't want to play nice, don't play at all. -Justin (koavf), talk, mail 17:29, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Koavf, you are wasting your time, Abdelaziz's Pre-Polisario life will be in the article or it will removed altogether. The Saharan provinces are not considered by the UN as occupied, but under Moroccan administration, it is the reason the UE includes Western Sahara in treaties i signs with morocco (for. ex. the fishing accords). So Actually I am bringing orthodox views. As to the warning you keep on pasting here, they are amusing. Keep on pasting more. --SteveLo 18:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[1] made on June 17 2006 (UTC) to Mohamed Abdelaziz

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 12 hours. Hopefully this is more amusing than a warning William M. Connolley 19:02, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re your mail... Koavf does appear to be ready to talk; so do so... William M. Connolley 09:00, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Connolley, in my opinion, the blocking was an abuse of admin power, you could have frozen the page and called for talks instead of chosing to blocking me while letting the other part edit as he wishes. Did you read my comments on the talk page?, Koavf asks me to bring a source for everything I write, while he thinks he does not need to give any. I ask your mediation/moderation of our debate, if you are not available, please let me know. --SteveLo 10:46, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I dislike freezing pages, blocks are better. I don't do mediation I'm afraid - try the std mediation route William M. Connolley 12:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I meant temporarely freezing, and letting people sort the differences is more of Wikipedia spirit. If you like blocking, blocking both sides sounds more fair. Blocking just one part of the edit-war is undoubtedly partiality, which an admin should be free from. --SteveLo 12:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ban

===>Onwards and upwards I suggest you take this as an opportunity to review rules on Wikipedia, formulate arguments in favor of your proposed changes, and find evidence for them. I'd be happy to discuss changes to Western Sahara-related articles. -Justin (koavf), talk, mail 19:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Justin, look at your own page. You have been blocked several times and people still complain about you. One should look it his "own nose" before giving lessons to others.
SteveLo is absolutely right with his remark. The admin should have frozen temporarely the page and not just block him because he "does not like to freeze pages".
The page on Abdelaziz will be certainnly completed.
And please don't invite me to do so because I will do when I want to.

wikima 05:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

=====> Well, start by bringing the proof for Smara as the birth place of Abdelaziz, and by explaining why his pre-Polisario life should not at any price be mentionned. --SteveLo 12:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC) -[reply]