User talk:Stevardo 56

Proposed deletion of News of may day march in Belfast, Ireland 2009

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article News of may day march in Belfast, Ireland 2009, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Original research

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Passportguy (talk) 12:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your text was already deleted once from page 2009 May Day protests, for the same reason. Please understand wikipedia is not a blog and it has its own rules. Please read the follwing policies: wikipedia:Verifiability, WP:CITE, and wikipedia:No original research. - Altenmann >t 21:41, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Totally Censored under an "AURORA" of Red Tape. I will pass on this experience to others.[reply]
Also, you user page is not your personal blog.( User pages are instruments of cooperation in creation of wikipedia. Any other usage is strongly discouraged. - Altenmann >t 21:44, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

N.B. WIKI Main News Headers should contain BALANCED reporting to avoid negative feedback. Stevardo 56 (talk) 21:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC) All May Day Marches were not violent and far from it![reply]

Wikipedia is not in the business of reporting. It is encyclopedia. If someone publishes a verifiable report in reliable sources (notice that there are reliable sources besides Big Media), then wikipedia articles may be written based on these publications. - Altenmann >t 22:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC).Why then did Wiki put the emphasis on "VIOLENCE" as it was not the overall impression of May Day Rallies World wide. Take a look at your e-pages, Lets have some "Balance" man. I was not carrying a brick to throw at Police.I praised the police in my article for their service to the smooth running of the PEACEFUL Belfast May Day Parade.Why "Cherry-Pick" out the "Violence". this is the point you don't seem to grasp.Was "Violence" the be-all and end-all of your May Day e-pages. Call them what you like "Encyclobites, Reportobites, or Articlo-ites.If your team MUST put them in let them be seen as un-biased for goodness sake or does a hegemony haunt the corridors there.Stevardo 56 (talk) 23:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide references about reports of peaceful events during May 1st. I will look too. Of course, violence in a sensationalist news media bias, and I agree this must be neutralized. I am sure there is left press, too. - Altenmann >t 16:17, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Yes indeed,my article in Wiki.was a first-hand eye-witness report of the "Peaceful" Belfast May Day demonstration. When it comes to getting the balance right there were far more peaceful demos.than bloody ones throughout the world last week.The first peaceful May Day demo.in the world as you know started in the U.S.A. and for that,I always say "May the Gods Bless Uncle Sam" and "The greatest good to the greatest number".Stevardo 56 (talk) 10:05, 9 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]