User talk:Stevab/ILMUNC

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
NA	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

University of Pennsylvania NA‑class

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject University of Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of University of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of Pennsylvania articles
NA	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This user page was nominated for deletion on 6 May 2013. The result of the discussion was delete.

Untitled

This article is about a well-regarded Model UN Conference on the high school circuit. I tried to create an article about it because it is extremely well-known and there should be an article about it. I agree that the article at the moment is not very well-written, but I will work on that, and I am certain that many people will view this article and re-write it so that it satisfactorily explains the conference.

The main problem is that it appears to violate the copyright of www.ilmunc.com, and you'll have to deal with that by reading the material at WP:COPYRIGHT and/or Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright (more easily accessed by following the links in the pink box at the top of the article itself). However, there is another issue that someone will need to address sooner or later, and that is that there are no reliable sources that back up what you have asserted here and in the article. If there are arm's-length, third-party experts writing in recognized publications who say that this is "extremely well-known", that's something that needs to be made clear in the article (and the more such sources the better). You may want to have a look at this page which outlines the basic requirements for Wikipedia articles. Accounting4Taste:talk 00:04, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]