User talk:Stephen Allcroft
|
July 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Leyland Panther has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): therearenginedbusclub@yahoogroups.com. It appears that you inserted an e-mail address to Leyland Panther. Wikipedia pages should not contain personal information. For more information, please read Wikipedia:Biography of Living People, specifically the section about personal information.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:54, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Your contributed article, ALbion Aberdonian
[edit]
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, ALbion Aberdonian. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Albion Aberdonian. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Albion Aberdonian - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:32, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Albion Nimbus, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.old-bus-photos.co.uk/?cat=48. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:48, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome back
[edit]Glad to see you haven't left us after all. You had me worried, not editing for four weeks like that! I think you could be very beneficial to the project, especially given your track record in Buses Magazine. My name is Stephen Gow. I wrote the Titan article that was credited to you by mistake. I've been active on Wikipedia for quite a while now, so hopefully I can be of some help to you.
And that's really what I'm here about. The articles you've contributed so far are pretty good by many people's standards, but I think there's room for quite a bit of improvement. Given how little guidance you seem to have received so far, that's understandable. One thing I've noticed that isn't a great idea is sections like this one. Drawing conclusions based on what's been stated by sources is a form of original research, which Wikipedia doesn't like. If a reliable source (printed or online) has said it directly, then it's OK to use it to justify the conclusion, but you need to cite the sources directly in the text (as you did on Thomas Harrington Ltd, which you did a good job with).
Then there's references. You've made a good start by including them in the articles, so well done on that. But it's generally felt that it's better to use the sources within the article's text to verify each individual point, rather than as a general reference. The problem with the general references is that a reader doesn't know which bits are backed up by each source, and which ones aren't backed up. You should probably read Wikipedia:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability, which are quite important and give some good advice.
Sorry for writing loads; I hope all this isn't too off-putting. Good luck with the Leyland-MCW Olympic by the way. That won't be an easy one to write... Alzarian16 (talk) 20:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Citations
[edit]Hello again. Nice to see that you're including more references in your recent article creations. However, you're formatting them a little wrong. Typing {{cite|}} followed by all the information doesn't quite work as the info needs to be in separate parameters, so it doesn't show up on the page. Wikipedia:Citation templates should explain how to fix it. Happy editing! Alzarian16 (talk) 17:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi. You will see I have done some copy-editing within your recent edits. I ran out of lunchtime, which is why there are un-checked links and one section is not checked at all (yet). I have left some comments in-line for you. Perhaps you can double-check the links I have added.
A couple of further observations:
- The new text is completely unreferenced, so we have to take on trust what you have written (and WP doesn't work like that!)
- There is enough text about Atkinsons now, for the related sections to be moved to a separate article Atkinson Vehicles Ltd, which is currently a redirect. The residual article will be a bit stubby to start with, but hopefully will attract further contributors.
- Would benefit from pictures in the new sections to illustrate the different vehicles mentioned. (Not sure how many are available at Commons.. I did try to find some Atkinsons at GDSF, but these pics are still on my camera.
EdJogg (talk) 13:43, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of William Black, Baron Black
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on William Black, Baron Black requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
The article William Black, Baron Black has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline for biographies
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:29, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 26
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leyland Tiger (front-engined), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leyland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guy Motors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page London Transport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
October 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Leyland-MCW Olympian may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Omnibus Co]] took 1 in 1954, 40 in 1956 and six in 1958. [[Trinidad]] Bus Service had four in 1956( the one pictured in the MCW official picture carries a tiger cub badge.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:40, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albion Lowlander, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gotham, Ministry of Defence and Atlantean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 23
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albion Lowlander, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leyland Royal Tiger PSU, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sterling, Preston and Weymouth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Reference errors on 26 March
[edit] Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Bridgeton, Glasgow page, your edit caused an ISBN error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Please see
[edit]Hi stephen,
Please see my reply and referral at User talk:Peter Horn#Leyland Royal Tiger Worldmaster
Peter Horn User talk 16:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Stephen Allcroft. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
[edit]
|
|
Thanks for all your help on the 'pedia! |
Happy New Year, Stephen Allcroft!
[edit]
Stephen Allcroft,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Stephen Allcroft. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Stephen Allcroft. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)