User talk:Stephen1108

January 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Rozonda Thomas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 01:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Discipline (Janet Jackson album). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 00:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

I saw no difference in quality of the image. So continue on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Compwhizii (talk • contribs) 00:45, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still, there was no change article wise Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 00:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Feedback_cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Feedback_cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Openallnight.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Openallnight.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 16:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

discipline

For Janet's album Discipline: Why are you putting back your older edits which don't match the standards for album editing? You put non-interlude songs in bold (which none of the album articles do that), "Japanes" adjective doesn't exist, you didn't mention which songs are interludes (which is important, as it is going to be printed on the album itself) etc. Seki rs (talk) 20:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

discipline

one more thing: you didn't write Missy Elliott as featuring artist (which is on janet's website), and also didn't put songs under " " which makes the basis of writing track listing of these articles... Seki rs (talk) 20:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Disciplinehqcover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Disciplinehqcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rockwitchu.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rockwitchu.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bi-Polar by Chilli

why did u delete the photo??? it's the official album cover. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daz11R (talk • contribs) 03:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why the attitude???? I didn't know Daz11R (talk) 03:38, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to In a Perfect World.... Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Σ xplicit 21:36, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In A Perfect World...

I have mentioned it under the promotional section but we shouldnt list "Get Your Money Up" as an official single until we have dates etc. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:02, 9 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Knock You Down Cover

please can you clarify your sources for the cover art? if not it will be nominated for deletion. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 08:15, 22 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Knockyoudown.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Knockyoudown.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Sheaint.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sheaint.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In Love & War

The reason i keep redirect in love & war is because at the moment the album is a stub. there is nowhere near enough information to warrant a page. album pages before release should contain background information about the recording and production etc. we dont really have that for this album. really the album SHOULD be re-directed because there is no cover-art and no background info or confirmed track-list. the small amount of information that exists could easily be added to the Amerie page. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 12:13, 9 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Im about to retire for the night but there is some interesting information at [1] that you could include in the background & production section. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 00:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Make Me/Janet Jackson discography

I have removed "Make Me". Do not re-add, there is no source which is explicitly says "Make Me" will definately appear on the number1's album or that it is even going to be released as the album's lead single. Please do not add until there is sufficient independent coverage. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 19:08, 27 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Make Me HAS been released as a single, regardless of if there is enough proof of it being "Number 1's", there is MORE than enough proof confirming it as a single, which should warrant it a Wikipedia page. The proof behind it being a single release for the Greatest Hits album is that the single was released under the A&M imprint, which is the same label that is releasing the "Number 1's" CD coming November 17th. For promo to start, logically speaking, a single would have to released about 2 months in advance. Still, in the end, the song was released as a single, and that along should warrant it a Wikipedia page. --Stephen1108 (talk) 19:50, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is supposed and speculated. Arists often release songs as promos. "Make Me" could easily be a promo. Until there is an independent source that specifically calls "Make Me" a single, and a single from the "number 1's" it cannot be referred to as a single on wikipeida. Furthermore WP:NSONGS and previous AfDs have indicated that until a song charts and/or until it recieves extensive indpendent coverage it should not have its own page. Creating a page just to say the song has been released is poitnless. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 19:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

No gravity

How do those 'snippets' prove that the song in question wasn't produced by Darkchild? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 22:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How do they prove that it is produced by Darkchild? The song on the ASCAP website is not registered to Shontelle, and anyone who follows Darkchild knows that the Helpless on there is in fact Blaque's 2003 song from their unreleased album Torch. --Stephen1108 (talk) 00:34, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arg! well I'm fed up of arguing with poeople over silly things so we'll just wait. The album will be out in few days then we'll know for sure anyway. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 00:50, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bi-Polar (Chilli album) for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Bi-Polar (Chilli album), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bi-Polar (Chilli album) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:58, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Disciplinehqcover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Disciplinehqcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]