User talk:Stephen-Lord-Wiki

This is User Stephen-Lord-Wiki's talk page. Please type any concerns you may have on my talk page.

Oi Stephen you f**king b**stard give me that money by Friday or you'll pay the price. Nicholas-Ball-Wiki (talk) 17:02, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You dirty vandal, don't bring me or my family into this. Stephen-Lord-Wiki (talk) 17:04, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Give me the money then. Nicholas-Ball-Wiki (talk) 17:07, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't create multiple accounts to have conversations with yourself. It's very creepy, and is against Wikipedia rules. See WP:SOCK. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 17:48, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stephen-Lord-Wiki for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. raseaC^{talk to me} 17:51, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely for disruption and sock puppetry. (blocked by –MuZemike 03:29, 14 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stephen-Lord-Wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am appealing agaist my block as I am not a sock of Nicholas-Ball-Wiki I am a victim being threatened by Nicholas-Ball-Wiki and he should be blocked and face sanctions not me. Also I should be able to edit Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stephen-Lord-Wiki as it is unfare for the wikipeida community to block me without me taking part in that concurrent situation.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sockpuppet of User:Mcjakeqcool. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:07, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stephen-Lord-Wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I deny that I am User Mcjakeqcool, I am Stephen Lord. I'm a good friend of Sisqo from Celebrity Big Brother. Stephen-Lord-Wiki (talk) 20:47, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not really a good or convincing reason to unblock. — Daniel Case (talk) 13:40, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.