User talk:Steiger01

December 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your e-mail, declaring yourself as a paid editor is required by policy. However, it doesn't permit you to make promotional edits as part of your work. It's not just the draft you created (twice) that triggered my block, but your edit-warring over your poorly crafted, unsourced promotional edits to Camera dolly. I don't see you as an asset to this project.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:58, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Thomas Janze

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Thomas Janze, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 14:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 15:42, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your e-mail. There is no reason to e-mail another editor unless you have something to say that cannot be said publicly. I assume your reason for doing so is that you've been blocked from editing. You say "So please do some research, check the references", and you immediately to go on to suggest I look at IMDb. IMDb is not considered a reliable reference - check out Wikipedia:Reliable sources#User-generated content which explains why it should not be used. So possibly you need to familiarize yourself with the guidelines before going any further. Deb (talk) 17:44, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb: In case you haven't noticed, the user has been e-mailing me as well (see above). I responded here to the first but will not respond to the second.

@Steiger01, do not send me any more e-mail, or I will disable your ability to do so.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:53, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

E-mail disabled.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:26, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Steiger01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

not promotional, disputed biography is translation from German Wikipedia not written by me, biography is supported by different sources, Bbb23 was asked but failed to explain why this biography is promotional and/or my account is a spam/advertising only-account, Bb23 blocked my e-mail instead, I am willing to understand and change but are hindered because I do not get answers or support Steiger01 (talk) 16:27, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Every single one of your edits has been a link to a commercial website. This is why you are blocked. Your email was disabled because you were asked not to email a volunteer and persisted. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.