User talk:Stefanwilhelm

Ulrich Hagen

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Ulrich Hagen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Anas ^talk? 01:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Typo redirect "ulrich hagen"

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on "ulrich hagen", by Haemo (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because "ulrich hagen" is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting "ulrich hagen", please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate "ulrich hagen" itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ulrich Hagen

I've nominated Ulrich Hagen, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Ulrich Hagen satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulrich Hagen and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Ulrich Hagen during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Anas ^talk? 19:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]