User talk:Stefan Verlag

January 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Halaba people, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 20:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Along these lines: I noticed that you changed population figures in a number of articles mentioning the Kambaata people. Unfortunately, you cannot change population numbers anywhere in Wikipedia without providing a reliable source supporting this claim, such as a recent census (which doesn't exist since the last in 2007), or other documents by the Ethiopian Central Statistics Agency, or the CIA factbook, or the Ethnologue, or an academic publication providing good numbers. So I had to revert all these edits. And another piece of advice: you can reduce the number of edits to an article (and make it therefore more manageable for other readers) by using the preview feature, so you don't have to constantly make new edits to correct your old edits. Otherwise: Thanks for participating in Wikipedia! I hope that today's hard encounter with Wikipedia's rules doesn't discourage you. Keep editing, and with time, once you figure out how things are done, your edits will stand! Landroving Linguist (talk) 21:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Look, you continue to pursue your Kambaata POV edits in spite of several warnings, like in this or this edit. Yes, we have all understood that you think that the Tembaro people and the Halaba and Haddiya and their brothers are all really Kambaata people, and in the case of the Tembaro I may even heartily agree with you. But the fact is that relevant sources, such as the Ethiopian census of 2007, see all these ethnic groups as different people, with their own recognition. I have even provided an extra source on this. So, if you don't stop your original research and POV editing, I will have to report you to admin who will have to introduce sanctions for you, which may include removal of editing privileges, which is usually the consequence of persistent disruptive editing. Please don't let it come to that. This is my final warning. Landroving Linguist (talk) 14:21, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kembata Tembaro Zone without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 17:18, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan Verlag, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Stefan Verlag! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 17:40, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently this block did not have the effect it was hoped to have. Now that the blog has expired, you continue your disruptive editing in the same way as before. Look, we somehow need to get through to you that Wikipedia is a project governed by rules. The next block is not going to be 31 hours, but longer, if not indefinite. If you want to contribute to Wikipedia any further, you need to start following the rules now! Landroving Linguist (talk) 13:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Look, User:Stefan_Verlag, doing the same disruptive stuff, just two months later, does not mean that you won't get blocked for it this time. Don't make edits in the face of sources that state the exact opposite of what you write. Landroving Linguist (talk) 08:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, since you went so blatantly about it spreading your disruptive edits over several pages, there will not be another warning. Landroving Linguist (talk) 09:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Kambata, Kambata language, Halaba people, Alaba special woreda, and Kembata Tembaro Zone) for a period of 2 weeks for ignoring warnings, failure to discuss issues on talk pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 20:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ilteero

The article Ilteero has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, and no people with the name on enwiki that I can find (from Special:PrefixIndex/Ilteero) to justify an SIA.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Elli (talk | contribs) 07:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kingdom of Kembata

Hello, Stefan Verlag. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kingdom of Kembata, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kingdom of Kembata

Hello, Stefan Verlag. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kingdom of Kembata".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:55, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]