User talk:Stears81

1

Image copyright problem with Image:Tihanyi 1926 tv.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Tihanyi 1926 tv.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:12, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Tihanyi tv 1926.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Tihanyi tv 1926.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:37, 16 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 12:37, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Stears81, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bidgee (talk) 12:55, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Television. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Bidgee (talk) 13:05, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to History of television. The Helpful One ^(Review) 13:13, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit-warring, both with this account and while logged out. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:04, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note for reviewing administrators- This user has continued edit-warring using the ip User:89.223.192.121. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:04, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Increased to a week, because of continued edit warring using IP accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:07, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

If you are right about the history of television, you will be able to create the changes you desire only by persuading other users you are right. That means polite conversation on talk pages and sharing multiple reliable sources that confirm that the best available information supports your desired changes. If you continue edit-warring, your desired changes will never be made, because Wikipedia works by consensus. If you are wrong, of course, you should carefully weigh the evidence presented in discussion with other users and acknowledge that they are right. When your block expires, try this: rather than changing the articles again, see if you can use the talk pages to persuade other users to change them. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:08, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Matyastemplom111.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Matyastemplom111.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Court of Hunyad Castle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Court of Hunyad Castle.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 13:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ladislaus I

Stears, where did you get the idea that Ladislaus was the leader of the First Crusade? He was dead before the crusade even started. Adam Bishop (talk) 14:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: Because It is fact. Saint Ladislaus died before the arrival of papal herald. Read the Vatican's official Hungarian page: http://www.katolikus.hu/hun-saints/ladislaus.html

Hmm, that's strange. Nevertheless, it is still completely untrue. The kings of England, France, and Spain also had nothing to do with the First Crusade. Adam Bishop (talk) 14:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Answer:

Hahaha:-)))))Hey MAN! Use your Brain! Where were crusaders from? Do you think, crusaders came from the Moon or Saturn?

They came from France and Italy. The king of France was not allowed to participate because he was excommunicated. There were a few English crusaders but the king of England was not involved. In 1095 there was no king of Spain, and the Spanish were also not allowed to participate because they already had their own wars against the Muslims. The crusaders did pass through Hungary, but it was Kolman, not Ladislaus, who dealt with them. Perhaps that website is confusing the Fourth Crusade, when the king of Hungary was asked to join, or the Fifth Crusade, when (as you obviously know) Andrew played a major role. But Ladislaus was never a leader of the First Crusade and that website is mistaken. Adam Bishop (talk) 00:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

Spanish kingdoms existed, the spanish countries united in the 17. century. Pope wasn't so greatpower as you tried to suggest. Popes originally were vassals of the Emperors, So popes tried to create a counterfeit text from ancient Rome. But Emperors didn't belive it. Sometimes popes were bundled out by Emperors. Holy Roman Emperors (who were the leaders of all catholic country) and Byzantine emperors (who were the leaders of all orthodox countries)were the main powers of the continent in X XI XII century. Read about early HRE. at www.britannica.com . Without the permission of Monarchs, the crusades have never happend.

That is totally incorrect. But I guess it doesn't matter if you have stopped editing those articles. Adam Bishop (talk) 17:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AM I INCORRECT? Read more Britannica, this is the mainstream history. It is written by professional academic historians, you are a very little point, you are just a dabbler.

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Engineer, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

You seem to be on a campaign of adding your Budapest university material to countless articles where it is not relevant, or at the very least was being given undue prominence compared with other institutions. Other examples were Technology, University, and Industrial Revolution . Your institution has its own page, but it doesn't need a mention on so many other pages. Please desist.

David Biddulph (talk) 19:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha, Hungary has higher ratio in Nobel prize scientist / population than your England. After all, think it over what you said. Barbarian. (This unsigned comment from the user, Stears81, who apparently hasn't learned how to sign a comment on a talk page).

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to World War I, you will be blocked from editing. --Labattblueboy (talk) 20:09, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Vandal Labattblueboy! Please don't delete such an important statistic data as "ARMY SIZE" in WW I article!

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't edit-war. Instead, discuss your desired changes politely on the talk page until consensus is reached; if consensus does not support your desired edits, then accept that gracefully. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fisher, please don't be unthinking! I always use Britannica sources and references. Britannica is the dominant cyclopaedia of the western world. Please retrace and read, before you delete!

I haven't made any edits to the article you were edit-warring over; I do not care about the subject. When your block expires, please discuss your desired changes rather than edit-warring. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:31, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Buda-medieval-palace.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Buda-medieval-palace.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Hunyad-castle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hunyad-castle.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:01, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]