User talk:Staypuffmarsh

November 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Fault in Our Stars (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Fault in Our Stars (film) was changed by Staypuffmarsh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952324 on 2015-11-13T01:49:19+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 72 (number). Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 72 (number) was changed by Staypuffmarsh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956167 on 2015-11-13T01:52:59+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?

Hello, Staypuffmarsh! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 02:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moo Moo 72 (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Staypuffmarsh/sandbox/Moo Moo 72 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 02:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Troye Sivan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been or will be undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cannolis (talk) 17:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Troye

Thanks for your edit on Troye Sivan, but I don't think we really need a line saying "Troye is best known for his music and YouTube channel." That is an obvious statement, given what comes just before it. But thanks for contributing! Brianga (talk) 17:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Staypuffmarsh/sandbox/Moo Moo 72

Hello, Staypuffmarsh. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox/Moo Moo 72".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Penguins (film)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli ^Talk 14:37, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]